The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objective: To examine the daily bed requirements arising from the flow of emergency admissions to an acute hospital, to identify the implications of fluctuating and unpredictable demands for emergency admission for the management of hospital bed capacity, and to quantify the daily risk of insufficient capacity for patients requiring immediate admission. Design: Modelling of the dynamics of the hospital system, using a discrete-event stochastic simulation model, which reflects the relation between demand and available bed capacity. Setting: Hypothetical acute hospital in England. Subjects: Simulated emergency admissions of all types except mental disorder. Main outcome measures: The risk of having no bed available for any patient requiring immediate admission; the daily risk that there is no bed available for at least one patient requiring immediate admission; the mean bed occupancy rate. Results: Risks are discernible when average bed occupancy rates exceed about 85%, and an acute hospital can expect regular bed shortages and periodic bed crises if average bed occupancy rises to 90% or more. Conclusions: There are limits to the occupancy rates that can be achieved safely without considerable risk to patients and to the efficient delivery of emergency care. Spare bed capacity is therefore essential for the effective management of emergency admissions, and its cost should be borne by purchasers as an essential element of an acute hospital service. Key messages Acute hospitals which operate at bed occupancy levels of 90% or more face regular bed crises, with the associated risks to patients Management interventions should focus on measures with long term benefits to counteract the growth trend in demand for admission Many initiatives have only a short term effect; they briefly delay the worst effects but do not address the growing mismatch between supply and demand Evaluating management interventions year on year at a single hospital is futile—any effects are swamped by random variations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trzeciak, S., & Rivers, E. P. (2003) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.20.5.402 · Cited by 834
Sprivulis, P. C., Da Silva, J., Jacobs, I. G., Jelinek, G. A., & Frazer, A. R. L. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00203.x · Cited by 759
Sprivulis, P. C., Da Silva, J., Jacobs, I. G., Frazer, A. R. L., & Jelinek, G. A. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00416.x · Cited by 757
Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature
Günal, M. M., & Pidd, M. (2010) · Journal of Simulation · doi:10.1057/jos.2009.25 · Cited by 560
A Framework for Operational Modelling of Hospital Resources
Harper, P. R. (2002) · Health Care Management Science · doi:10.1023/a:1019767900627 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagust, A., Place, M., & Posnett, J. W.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-07-17
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 7203
- Pages
- 155-158
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2043342071
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.319.7203.155
- The paper
- Bagust, A., Place, M., & Posnett, J. W. (1999). Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7203.155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.