The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paternalism or partnership?
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Homo-oligomeric ligand-activated proteins are ubiquitous in biology. The functions of such molecules are commonly regulated by allosteric coupling between ligand binding sites. Understanding the basis for this regulation requires both quantifying the free energy ΔG transduced between sites, and the structural basis by which it is transduced. We consider allostery in three variants of the model ring-shaped homo-oligomeric trpRNA binding attenuation protein, TRAP. First, we developed nearest-neighbor statistical thermodynamic binding models comprising microscopic free energies for ligand binding to isolated sites ΔGN0, and for coupling between one or both adjacent sites, ΔGN1 and ΔGN2. Using the resulting partition function (PF) we explored the effects of these parameters on simulated population distributions for the 2N possible liganded states. We then experimentally monitored liganddependent population shifts using conventional spectroscopic and calorimetric methods, and using native mass spectrometry (MS). By resolving species with differing numbers of bound ligands by their mass, native MS revealed striking differences in their ligand-dependent population shifts. Fitting the populations to a binding polynomial derived from the PF yielded coupling free energy terms corresponding to orders of magnitude differences in cooperativity. Uniquely, this approach predicts which of the possible 2N liganded states are populated at different ligand concentrations, providing necessary insights into regulation. The combination of statistical thermodynamic modeling with native MS may provide the thermodynamic foundation for a meaningful understanding of the structure-thermodynamic linkage that drives cooperativity. TOC Figure (draft)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1920) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.4.1.25 · Cited by 1,606
The Doctor, His Patient, and the Illness
(1957) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.33.382.417-a · Cited by 1,268
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review
O'Connor, A. M., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Holmes-Rovner, M., Barry, M., & Jones, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731 · Cited by 873
Patient participation in decision-making
Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00059-8 · Cited by 796
Dealing With Medical Practice Variations: A Proposal for Action
Wennberg, J. E. (1984) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6 · Cited by 712
Towle, A., Godolphin, W., Greenhalgh, T., & Gambrill, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766 · Cited by 646
Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation
(1999) · Practice Nursing · doi:10.12968/pnur.1999.10.12.4 · Cited by 638
Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey
Howie, J. G. R., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., Walker, J. J., Freeman, G. K., & Rai, H. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.738 · Cited by 362
Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Gwyn, R., & Grol, R. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753 · Cited by 299
Helping patients access high quality health information
Shepperd, S., Charnock, D., & Gann, B. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.764 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., & Payne, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.468 · Cited by 766
(2000) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 737
Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions
Foster, G., Taylor, S. J., Eldridge, S., Ramsay, J., & Griffiths, C. J. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005108.pub2 · Cited by 592
Zhang, X., Liu, S., Deng, Z., & Chen, X. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.028 · Cited by 355
Patient‐oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students
Spencer, J., Blackmore, D., Heard, S., McCrorie, P., McHaffie, D., Scherpbier, A., Gupta, T. S., Singh, K., & Southgate, L. (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00779.x · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Coulter, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-09-18
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 7212
- Pages
- 719-720
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1497065770
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 25.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paternalism or partnership? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719
- The paper
- Coulter, A. (1999). Paternalism or partnership? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.