Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paternalism or partnership?

Open access
Coulter, A.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Homo-oligomeric ligand-activated proteins are ubiquitous in biology. The functions of such molecules are commonly regulated by allosteric coupling between ligand binding sites. Understanding the basis for this regulation requires both quantifying the free energy ΔG transduced between sites, and the structural basis by which it is transduced. We consider allostery in three variants of the model ring-shaped homo-oligomeric trpRNA binding attenuation protein, TRAP. First, we developed nearest-neighbor statistical thermodynamic binding models comprising microscopic free energies for ligand binding to isolated sites ΔGN0, and for coupling between one or both adjacent sites, ΔGN1 and ΔGN2. Using the resulting partition function (PF) we explored the effects of these parameters on simulated population distributions for the 2N possible liganded states. We then experimentally monitored liganddependent population shifts using conventional spectroscopic and calorimetric methods, and using native mass spectrometry (MS). By resolving species with differing numbers of bound ligands by their mass, native MS revealed striking differences in their ligand-dependent population shifts. Fitting the populations to a binding polynomial derived from the PF yielded coupling free energy terms corresponding to orders of magnitude differences in cooperativity. Uniquely, this approach predicts which of the possible 2N liganded states are populated at different ligand concentrations, providing necessary insights into regulation. The combination of statistical thermodynamic modeling with native MS may provide the thermodynamic foundation for a meaningful understanding of the structure-thermodynamic linkage that drives cooperativity. TOC Figure (draft)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Coulter, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-09-18
Volume
319
Issue
7212
Pages
719-720
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1497065770
Cited by
657
References
14
FWCI
25.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paternalism or partnership? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719
The paper
Coulter, A. (1999). Paternalism or partnership? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.