The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Helping patients access high quality health information
Open accessAbstract
The provision of consumer health information was pioneered in the United States: organisations such as Planetree (a not for profit, community based healthcare initiative) were among the first to provide information services.1 Over the years several organisations in the United Kingdom—including the College of Health, the Help for Health Trust, the Health Education Authority, the Health Education Board for Scotland, and self help groups—have provided information on a wide range of health topics directly to patients or consumers. Similar initiatives have been undertaken in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.2 More recently, developments in Britain such as local consumer health information services, the Patient Partnership Strategy,3 and initiatives at the King's Fund4 5 have improved awareness of and access to evidence based consumer health information. These developments have come at a time when the amount of health information is increasing, particularly through the internet—and amid increasing concern about the varying quality of health information accessed by patients. We outline some steps to help health professionals advise patients on where to find good quality health information in this rapidly changing field. #### Summary points Patients require access to good quality, evidence based information so they can take an active part in decisions about their health care The amount of information available to patients is increasing, particularly through the internet The quality of this information remains variable Health professionals need to be able to direct patients to sources of good quality consumer health information, including health related websites Some of the organisations in the United Kingdom that are funded to provide health information for patients and the public are listed in box 1. ### The internet The internet offers access to health information provided by many different organisations and agencies Several providers offer gateway services that operate a selective process, only including information …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
Cited by
Coulter, A. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719 · Cited by 657
McCray, A. T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1687 · Cited by 371
van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H. C., Taal, E., Smit, W. M., Seydel, E. R., & van de Laar, M. A. F. J. (2010) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-010-1435-1 · Cited by 44
(2005) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · Cited by 25
Rhebergen, M. D., Lenderink, A. F., van Dijk, F. J., & Hulshof, C. T. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1886 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepperd, S., Charnock, D., & Gann, B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-09-18
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 7212
- Pages
- 764-766
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1967676062
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Helping patients access high quality health information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.764
- The paper
- Shepperd, S., Charnock, D., & Gann, B. (1999). Helping patients access high quality health information. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.