The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the relation between mortality and income inequality in Canada with that in the United States. DESIGN: The degree of income inequality, defined as the percentage of total household income received by the less well off 50% of households, was calculated and these measures were examined in relation to all cause mortality, grouped by and adjusted for age. SETTING: The 10 Canadian provinces, the 50 US states, and 53 Canadian and 282 US metropolitan areas. RESULTS: Canadian provinces and metropolitan areas generally had both lower income inequality and lower mortality than US states and metropolitan areas. In age grouped regression models that combined Canadian and US metropolitan areas, income inequality was a significant explanatory variable for all age groupings except for elderly people. The effect was largest for working age populations, in which a hypothetical 1% increase in the share of income to the poorer half of households would reduce mortality by 21 deaths per 100 000. Within Canada, however, income inequality was not significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Canada seems to counter the increasingly noted association at the societal level between income inequality and mortality. The lack of a significant association between income inequality and mortality in Canada may indicate that the effects of income inequality on health are not automatic and may be blunted by the different ways in which social and economic resources are distributed in Canada and in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Contribution of Psychosocial Factors to Socioeconomic Differences in Health
Marmot, M. G., Fuhrer, R., Ettner, S. L., Marks, N. F., Bumpass, L. L., & Ryff, C. D. (1998) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00097 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health
Szreter, S. (2004) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh013 · Cited by 2,386
Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review
LYNCH, J., SMITH, G. D., HARPER, S., HILLEMEIER, M., ROSS, N., KAPLAN, G. A., & WOLFSON, M. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00302.x · Cited by 938
Self-citationShaw, M. (2004) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123036 · Cited by 791
Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations
Lynch, J., Smith, G. D., Hillemeier, M., Shaw, M., Raghunathan, T., & Kaplan, G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05407-1 · Cited by 450
Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study
Luo, Z.-C. (2006) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.051096 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, N. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7239
- Pages
- 898-902
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967817453
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.898
- The paper
- Ross, N. A. (2000). Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and in the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.