The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice: multicentre, randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability and safety of a minor illness service led by practice nurses in general practice. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 5 general practices in south east London and Kent representing semi-rural, suburban, and urban settings. PARTICIPANTS: 1815 patients requesting and offered same day appointments by receptionists. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to treatment by either a specially trained nurse or a general practitioner. Patients seen by a nurse were referred to a general practitioner when appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The general satisfaction of the patients as measured by the consultation satisfaction questionnaire. Other outcome measures included the length of the consultation, number of prescriptions written, rates of referral to general practitioners, patient's reported health status, patient's anticipated behaviour in seeking health care in future, and number of patients who returned to the surgery, visits to accident and emergency, and out of hours calls to doctors. RESULTS: Patients were very satisfied with both nurses and doctors, but they were significantly more satisfied with their consultations with nurses (mean (SD) score of satisfaction 78.6 (16. 0) of 100 points for nurses v 76.4 (17.8) for doctors; 95% confidence interval for difference between means -4.07 to -0.38). Consultations with nurses took about 10 minutes compared with about 8 minutes for consultations with doctors. Nurses and doctors wrote prescriptions for a similar proportion of patients (nurses 481/736 (65.4%) v doctors 518/816 (63.5%)). 577/790 (73%) patients seen by nurses were managed without any input from doctors. CONCLUSION: Practice nurses seem to offer an effective service for patients with minor illnesses who request same day appointments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baker, R. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 360
Plamping, D. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6779.737 · Cited by 331
Murphy, A. W., Bury, G., Plunkett, P. K., Gibney, D., Smith, M., Mullan, E., & Johnson, Z. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1135 · Cited by 160
Establishing a minor illness nurse in a busy general practice
Marsh, G. N., & Dawes, M. G. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6982.778 · Cited by 83
Nurse-led management of minor illness in a GP surgery.
Rees, M., & Kinnersley, P. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 24
Establishing a minor illness nurse in a busy general practice: May reduce doctors' workload
Campbell, A., Herdman, M., Kearsley, N., & Maric, S. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6991.1404b · Cited by 7
Increasing the number of organ transplants
Matesanz, R., Miranda, B., & Felipe, C. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6991.1404 · Cited by 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horrocks, S., Anderson, E., & Salisbury, C. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819 · Cited by 1,235
Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care
Laurant, M. G. H., Reeves, D., Hermens, R., Braspenning, J., Grol, R. P. T. M., & Sibbald, B. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001271.pub2 · Cited by 961
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care
Laurant, M., van der Biezen, M., Wijers, N., Watananirun, K., Kontopantelis, E., & van Vught, A. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001271.pub3 · Cited by 614
Skill mix in the health care workforce: reviewing the evidence.
Buchan, J., & Poz, M. R. D. (2002) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 317
Substitution of physicians by nurses in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Martínez-González, N. A., Djalali, S., Tandjung, R., Huber-Geismann, F., Markun, S., Wensing, M., & Rosemann, T. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-214 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Shum, C.
- Corresponding author
- Shum, C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-04-15
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7241
- Pages
- 1038-1043
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC27346
- OpenAlex
- W2069875531
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 54.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- practice nurses, minor illness, nurse-led care, general practice, same-day appointments, patient satisfaction, consultation time, drug prescribing, general practitioner referral, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adult, England, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Nurse-Patient Relations, Prognosis, Rural Health, Urban Health, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review