The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances: Consumer health informatics
Open accessAbstract
Medical informatics has expanded rapidly over the past couple of years. After decades of development of information systems designed primarily for physicians and other healthcare managers and professionals, there is an increasing interest in reaching consumers and patients directly through computers and telecommunications systems. Consumer health informatics is the branch of medical informatics that analyses consumers' needs for information; studies and implements methods of making information accessible to consumers; and models and integrates consumers' preferences into medical information systems. Consumer informatics stands at the crossroads of other disciplines, such as nursing informatics, public health, health promotion, health education, library science, and communication science, and is perhaps the most challenging and rapidly expanding field in medical informatics; it is paving the way for health care in the information age. This non-exhaustive review focuses on topics from the field of consumer health informatics because there has been a markedly increased interest in this field (additional information is available on the BMJ 's website). Medline was searched using the terms “consumer” and “informatics.” The proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association's symposiums (1998 and 1999) and the proceedings of the ninth World Congress on Medical Informatics (Medinfo 1998) were hand searched. The AltaVista search engine was used to retrieve information from the internet, using the search string “+definition + consumer health informatics” to find unpublished reports.1–3 Medical informatics is “the field that concerns itself with the cognitive, information processing, and communication tasks of medical practice, education, and research.” 4 Until recently medical informatics focused on developing applications for health professionals: medical informaticians looked at medical practice mainly through the eyes of health professionals rather than through the eyes of patients. Ten years ago Greenes and Shortliffe wrote: “After many years of development of information systems to support the infrastructure of …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tudor Hart, J. (1971) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x · Cited by 3,253
Eysenbach, G., Gray, J. A. M., Bonati, M., Arunachalam, S., Diepgen, T. L., Impicciatore, P., & Pandolfini, C. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496 · Cited by 461
Self-citationAccess to Health Information and Support: A Public Highway or a Private Road?
Eng, T. R., Maxfield, A., Patrick, K., Deering, M. J., Ratzan, S. C., & Gustafson, D. H. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1371 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E.-R. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2691 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationCheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 · Cited by 1,286
A Systematic Review of Healthcare Applications for Smartphones
Mosa, A. S. M., Yoo, I., & Sheets, L. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-67 · Cited by 1,184
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Eysenbach, G. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1030 · Cited by 1,143
Self-citationMetzger, M. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20672 · Cited by 871
Metadata
- Authors
- Eysenbach, G.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-06-24
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7251
- Pages
- 1713-1716
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579272596
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 77.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.