The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study Commentary: Congenital toxoplasmosis---further thought for food
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the odds ratio and population attributable fraction associated with food and environmental risk factors for acute toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Six large European cities. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with acute infection (cases) detected by seroconversion or positive for anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM were compared with pregnant women seronegative for toxoplasma (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios for acute infection adjusted for confounding variables; the population attributable fraction for risk factors. RESULTS: Risk factors most strongly predictive of acute infection in pregnant women were eating undercooked lamb, beef, or game, contact with soil, and travel outside Europe and the United States and Canada. Contact with cats was not a risk factor. Between 30% and 63% of infections in different centres were attributed to consumption of undercooked or cured meat products and 6% to 17% to soil contact. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequately cooked or cured meat is the main risk factor for infection with toxoplasma in all centres. Preventive strategies should aim to reduce prevalence of infection in meat, improve labelling of meat according to farming and processing methods, and improve the quality and consistency of health information given to pregnant women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physician advice for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., Buitrago, D., Preciado, N., Sanchez, G., Hartmann-Boyce, J., & Lancaster, T. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000165.pub4 · Cited by 1,955
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
Grilli, R., Ramsay, C., & Minozzi, S. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000389 · Cited by 533
Cited by
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
Food-borne diseases—The challenges of 20 years ago still persist while new ones continue to emerge
Newell, D. G., Koopmans, M., Verhoef, L., Duizer, E., Aidara-Kane, A., Sprong, H., Opsteegh, M., Langelaar, M., Threfall, J., Scheutz, F., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.021 · Cited by 1,257
Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in the United States
Jones, J. L., Dargelas, V., Roberts, J., Press, C., Remington, J. S., & Montoya, J. G. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/605433 · Cited by 490
SCALLAN, E., HOEKSTRA, R. M., MAHON, B. E., JONES, T. F., & GRIFFIN, P. M. (2015) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268814003185 · Cited by 296
Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats
Robertson, I. D., & Thompson, R. C. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01607-6 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, A. J. C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-07-15
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 7254
- Pages
- 142-147
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1526524284
- Cited by
- 1,016
- References
- 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study Commentary: Congenital toxoplasmosis---further thought for food. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.321.7254.142
- The paper
- Cook, A. J. C. (2000). Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study Commentary: Congenital toxoplasmosis---further thought for food. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7254.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.