The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of interpregnancy interval on maternal morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cross sectional study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay. SETTING: Latin America and the Caribbean, 1985-97. PARTICIPANTS: 456 889 parous women delivering singleton infants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of the effects of short and long interpregnancy intervals on maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, third trimester bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum haemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, and anaemia. RESULTS: Short (<6 months) and long (>59 months) interpregnancy intervals were observed for 2.8% and 19.5% of women, respectively. After adjustment for major confounding factors, compared with those conceiving at 18 to 23 months after a previous birth, women with interpregnancy intervals of 5 months or less had higher risks for maternal death (odds ratio 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.38), third trimester bleeding (1.73; 1.42 to 2.24), premature rupture of membranes (1.72; 1.53 to 1.93), puerperal endometritis (1.33; 1.22 to 1.45), and anaemia (1.30; 1.18 to 1.43). Compared with women with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, women with interpregnancy intervals longer than 59 months had significantly increased risks of pre-eclampsia (1.83; 1.72 to 1.94) and eclampsia (1.80; 1.38 to 2.32). CONCLUSIONS: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works
Campbell, O. M., & Graham, W. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69381-1 · Cited by 1,785
Cleland, J., Conde-Agudelo, A., Peterson, H., Ross, J., & Tsui, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60609-6 · Cited by 788
Self-citationGlobal climate change and children's health: threats and strategies for prevention
Sheffield, P. E., & Landrigan, P. J. (2011) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002233 · Cited by 502
Closely spaced pregnancies are associated with increased odds of autism in California sibling births
Cheslack-Postava, K., Liu, K., & Bearman, P. S. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2371 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Conde-Agudelo, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-11-18
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 7271
- Pages
- 1255-1259
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027157799
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1255
- The paper
- Conde-Agudelo, A. (2000). Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.