Cited by 143Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFamily and Disability Support Research

Closely spaced pregnancies are associated with increased odds of autism in California sibling births

Open access
Cheslack-Postava, Keely, Liu, Kayuet, Bearman, Peter S.·2011·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the interpregnancy interval (IPI) is associated with the risk of autism in subsequent births. METHODS: Pairs of first- and second-born singleton full siblings were identified from all California births that occurred from 1992 to 2002 using birth records, and autism diagnoses were identified by using linked records of the California Department of Developmental Services. IPI was calculated as the time interval between birth dates minus the gestational age of the second sibling. In the primary analysis, logistic regression models were used to determine whether odds of autism in second-born children varied according to IPI. To address potential confounding by unmeasured family-level factors, a case-sibling control analysis determined whether affected sibling (first versus second) varied with IPI. RESULTS: An inverse association between IPI and odds of autism among 662 730 second-born children was observed. In particular, IPIs of <12, 12 to 23, and 24 to 35 months were associated with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for autism of 3.39 (3.00–3.82), 1.86 (1.65–2.10), and 1.26 (1.10–1.45) relative to IPIs of ≥36 months. The association was not mediated by preterm birth or low birth weight and persisted across categories of sociodemographic characteristics, with some attenuation in the oldest and youngest parents. Second-born children were at increased risk of autism relative to their firstborn siblings only in pairs with short IPIs. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that children born after shorter intervals between pregnancies are at increased risk of developing autism; the highest risk was associated with pregnancies spaced <1 year apart.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2010-2371

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheslack-Postava, K., Liu, K., & Bearman, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholars, Columbia University, New York, New York; and
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
246-253
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2140324245
Cited by
143
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, interpregnancy interval, second-born children, full siblings, birth spacing, autism risk, preterm birth, low birth weight, parental age
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Birth Intervals, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hospital Records, Humans, Infant, Male, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review