The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: prospective study using questionnaires and semistructured
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy for women with increased risk of breast cancer and to identify, preoperatively, risk factors for postoperative distress. DESIGN: Prospective study using interviews and questionnaire assessments. SETTING: Participants' homes throughout the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 143 women with increased risk of developing breast cancer who were offered bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and who accepted or declined the surgery; a further 11 were offered surgery but deferred making a decision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological and sexual morbidity. RESULTS: Psychological morbidity decreased significantly over time for the 79 women who chose to have surgery (accepters): 58% (41/71) preoperatively v 41% (29/71) 6 months postoperatively (difference in percentages 17%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 32%; P=0.04) and 60% (39/65) preoperatively v 29% (19/65) 18 months postoperatively (31%, 15% to 47%; P<0.001). Psychological morbidity in the 64 women who declined surgery (decliners) did not decrease significantly: 57% (31/54) at baseline v 43% (23/54) at 6 months (14%, 0% to 29%; P=0.08) and 57% (29/52) at baseline v 41% (21/52) at 18 months (16%; -2% to 33%; P=0.11). Greater than normal proneness to anxiety was more common in the decliners than in the accepters: 78% (45/58) v 56% (41/73) (22%, 6% to 38%; P=0.006). Accepters were more likely than decliners to believe it inevitable that they would develop breast cancer (32% (24/74) v 10% (6/58) (difference in percentages 22%, 9% to 35%; P=0.003)), and decliners were more likely to believe that screening could help (92% (55/60) v 74% (55/74) (18%, 5% to 31%; P=0.007)). Level of sexual discomfort and degree of sexual pleasure did not change significantly over time in either of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy may provide psychological benefits in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These results are consistent with the findings of others [9,18,19], and indicate that the information provided at the family cancer clinic is complex, thus stressing the importance of repetitive but consistent information regarding the cancer risk by the different clinicians involved.”
From Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy (2009) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the majority of women following PM reported decreased (hereditary) cancer related distress while other psychosocial functioning does not appear to be significantly affected in a negative way [5,8-10].”
From Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy (2009) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
(1988) · NFER-Nelson eBooks · Cited by 5,560
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Woods, J. E., Crotty, T. P., Myers, J. L., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Sellers, T. A., Johnson, J. L., McDonnell, S. K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400201 · Cited by 1,428
A body image scale for use with cancer patients
Hopwood, P., Fletcher, I., Lee, A., & Al Ghazal, S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00353-1 · Cited by 984
The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction
Al‐Ghazal, S., Sully, L., Fallowfield, L. J., & Blamey, R. W. (2000) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1053/ejso.1999.0733 · Cited by 482
Marteau, T. M., & Richards, M. 1. J. 2. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511570049 · Cited by 351
Frost, M. H. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.319 · Cited by 325 · cited 1×
“The proportion of women expressing regret was small (6% of 370 participants), and regret was more common in those where discussion about the procedure was initiated by a physician, not the patient. Ninety per cent of the women who regretted surgery had not received preoperative counselling. Positive outcomes after bil…”
BackgroundCunha, G. R. (1994) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940801)74:3+ · Cited by 324
The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: A measure of women's sexual functioning
Thirlaway, K., Fallowfield, L. J., & Cuzick, J. (1996) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00435972 · Cited by 310
Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J. M., Meyer, L., Eeles, R. A., Ebbs, S. R., & Murday, V. A. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139 · Cited by 241
The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer
Evans, D. G., Blair, V., Greenhalgh, R., Hopwood, P., & Howell, A. (1994) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1994.423 · Cited by 172
Psychological Issues in Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility
Lerman, C. (1994) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420060027003 · Cited by 150
Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
Borgen, P., Hill, A., Tran, K. N., Zee, K. V., Massie, M., Payne, D., & Biggs, C. (1998) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf02303829 · Cited by 93
A question of choice: results of a prospective 3-year follow-up study of women with breast cancer
Fallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, P., Baum, M., & A’Hern, R. (1994) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/0960-9776(94)90046-9 · Cited by 63
Stead, M. L., Crocombe, W. D., Fallowfield, L. J., Selby, P. J., Perren, T. J., Garry, R., & Brown, J. M. (1999) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08084.x · Cited by 48
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: issues and concerns.
Stefanek, M. E. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 40
Prophylactic mastectomy for genetic predisposition to breast cancer: The Proband's story
Wang, J., Eeles, R. A., Cole, T. R. P., Taylor, R. W., Lunt, P. W., & Baum, M. (1996) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80656-9 · Cited by 21
Anxiety in women "at risk' of developing breast cancer
Thirlaway, K., Fallowfield, L. J., NUNNERLEY, H. B., & Powles, T. J. (1996) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1996.269 · Cited by 18
Thirlaway, K., Fallowfield, L. J., Evans, D. G., & Howell, A. (1995) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/0960-9776(95)90078-0 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Macke E. A family history of breast and ovarian cancer. In: Marteau TM, Richards MPM, eds. The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996:31-7.
- Lynch HT, Lynch J. Psychological aspects of monitoring high risk women for breast cancer. Cancer 1994;74:1184-92.
- Fallowfield L. Psychological implication of tamoxifen treatment in women at high risk to breast cancer. In: Maltoni C, Soffritti M, Davis W, eds. The scientific bases of cancer chemoprevention. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1996:219-25.
- Hopwood P, Keeling F, Long A, Pool C, Evans G, Howell A. Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some pre- liminary indicators. Psycho-oncology 1998;7:402-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breast Cancer after Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, B., van Putten, W. L. J., Henzen-Logmans, S. C., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Bartels, C. C. M., Verhoog, L. C., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Niermeijer, M. F., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107193450301 · Cited by 973
Fleissig, A., Fallowfield, L. J., Langridge, C., Johnson, L., Newcombe, R. G., Dixon, J. M., Kissin, M. W., & Mansel, R. E. (2005) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-005-9025-7 · Cited by 493
“Many patients with breast cancer [41] or at high risk of developing the disease [42] choose to undergo radical surgery, in the belief that this will improve their chances of survival.”
BackgroundKatapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., & Dodd, M. J. (2004) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012 · Cited by 476
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer
Lostumbo, L., Carbine, N. E., & Wallace, J. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002748.pub3 · Cited by 402
Nelson, H. D., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R. F., & Harris, E. L. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00012 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatcher, M. B.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hatcher, M. B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-01-13
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 7278
- Pages
- 76-76
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC26594
- OpenAlex
- W2013619739
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Keywords
- bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, breast cancer risk, psychosocial impact, psychological morbidity, anxiety proneness, breast cancer screening, helplessness
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
