The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of patients in fast track surgery
Open accessAbstract
Surgery is slowly undergoing revolutionary changes due to newer approaches to pain control, the introduction of techniques that reduce the perioperative stress response, and the use of minimally invasive operations. Subsequently, many surgical procedures (such as arthroscopic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, eye surgery, sterilisation procedures, herniorrhaphy, and cosmetic operations) are routinely performed on an outpatient basis. Recently published pilot studies suggest that when these newer approaches are used in patients undergoing more complex elective surgical procedures, postoperative complications can be reduced, length of hospital stay decreased, and time to recovery shortened. This review of recent advances made in this newly developing specialty of fast track surgery will emphasise techniques that facilitate early recovery after major surgical procedures. Fast track surgery combines various techniques used in the care of patients undergoing elective operations. The methods used include epidural or regional anaesthesia, minimally invasive techniques, optimal pain control, and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation, including early enteral (oral) nutrition and ambulation. The combination of these approaches reduces the stress response and organ dysfunction and therefore greatly shorten the time required for full recovery. Recent advances in understanding perioperative pathophysiology have indicated that multiple factors contribute to postoperative morbidity, length of stay in hospital, and convalescence (fig 1). Major improvements in surgical outcome may therefore require multifaceted interventions (fig 2). Ambulatory surgery has become routine for many procedures with a well documented record for safety and low morbidity, even in patients at high risk. 1 2 Studies of fast track surgery have evaluated somewhat similar approaches toward larger operations which carry more risk (box). Preliminary results from predominantly non-randomised trials have been positive (table). These studies have included high risk elderly patients undergoing operations such as segmental colonic resection, prostatectomy, and aortic aneurysmectomy. These preliminary data indicate topics for further randomised trials; the data need to …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients
Siddiqi, N., Harrison, J. K., Clegg, A., Teale, E. A., Young, J., Taylor, J., & Simpkins, S. A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005563.pub3 · Cited by 619
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice?
Melnyk, M., Casey, R. G., Black, P., & Koupparis, A. J. (2011) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.11002 · Cited by 384
Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care
Anderson, A. D. G., McNaught, C. E., MacFie, J., Tring, I., Barker, P., & Mitchell, C. J. (2003) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4371 · Cited by 375
Bollag, L., Lim, G., Sultan, P., Habib, A. S., Landau, R., Zakowski, M., Tiouririne, M., Bhambhani, S., & Carvalho, B. (2021) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005257 · Cited by 378
Semple, J. L., Sharpe, S., Murnaghan, M. L., Theodoropoulos, J., & Metcalfe, K. A. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3929 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilmore, D. W., & Kehlet, H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-02-24
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 7284
- Pages
- 473-476
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2134514260
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of patients in fast track surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473
- The paper
- Wilmore, D. W., & Kehlet, H. (2001). Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.