Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review

Open access
Poole, Phillippa J, Black, Peter N·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials that compared at least two months of regular oral mucolytic drugs with placebo. Studies: Twenty three randomised controlled trials in outpatients in Europe and United States. Main outcome measures: Exacerbations, days of illness, lung function, adverse events. Results: Compared with placebo, the number of exacerbations was significantly reduced in subjects taking oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference −0.07 per month, 95% confidence interval −0.08 to −0.05, P<0.0001). Based on the annualised rate of exacerbations in the control subjects of 2.7 a year, this is a 29% reduction. The number needed to treat for one subject to have no exacerbation in the study period would be 6. Days of illness also fell (weighted mean difference −0.56, −0.77 to −0.35, P<0.0001). The number of subjects who had no exacerbations in the study period was greater in the mucolytic group (odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 2.54, P<0.0001). There was no difference in lung function or in adverse events reported between treatments. Conclusions: In chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, treatment with mucolytics is associated with a reduction in acute exacerbations and days of illness. As these drugs have to be taken long term, they could be most useful in patients who have repeated, prolonged, or severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. What is already known on this topic: Mucolytic drugs have properties that may be beneficial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease These drugs are not prescribed in the United Kingdom and Australasia, although they are widely used in many other countries Drugs that reduce exacerbations may reduce the morbidity and healthcare costs associated with progressively severe disease What this study adds: Regular use of mucolytic drugs for at least two months significantly reduces exacerbations and days of illness compared with placebo in patients with chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Exacerbations that do occur may not be as severe, and the benefit may be greater in those with more severe disease Reductions are modest and treatment may not be cost effective

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1271

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Poole, P. J., & Black, P. N.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-05-26
Volume
322
Issue
7297
Pages
1271
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2013697207
Cited by
256
References
3
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1271
The paper
Poole, P. J., & Black, P. N. (2001). Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.