Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A score for predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease in adults with raised blood pressure, based on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials

Open access
Pocock, Stuart J, McCormack, Valerie, Gueyffier, François, Boutitie, Florent, Fagard, Robert H, Boissel, Jean-Pierre·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To create a risk score for death from cardiovascular disease that can be easily used. Design: Data from eight randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive treatment. Setting: Europe and North America. Participants: 47 088 men and women from trials that had differing age ranges and differing eligibility criteria for blood pressure. Main outcome measure: 1639 deaths from cardiovascular causes during a mean 5.2 years of follow up. Results: Baseline factors were related to risk of death from cardiovascular disease using a multivariate Cox model, adjusting for trial and treatment group (active versus control). A risk score was developed from 11 factors: age, sex, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol concentration, height, serum creatinine concentration, cigarette smoking, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, history of stroke, and history of myocardial infarction. The risk score is an integer, with points added for each factor according to its association with risk. Smoking contributed more in women and in younger age groups. In women total cholesterol concentration mattered less than in men, whereas diabetes had more of an effect. Antihypertensive treatment reduced the score. The five year risk of death from cardiovascular disease for scores of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 was 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.8%, 2.3%, 6.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. Age and sex distributions of the score from the two UK trials enabled individual risk assessment to be age and sex specific. Risk prediction models are also presented for fatal coronary heart disease, fatal stroke, and all cause mortality. Conclusion: The risk score is an objective aid to assessing an individual's risk of cardiovascular disease, including stroke and coronary heart disease. It is useful for physicians when determining an individual's need for antihypertensive treatment and other management strategies for cardiovascular risk. What is already known on this topic: Many other factors are known to affect the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with raised blood pressure A patient's overall risk should be taken into account when determining their need for antihypertensive drugs and other strategies for improving cardiovascular health What this study adds: A new score uses 11 risk factors to quantify an adult's risk of death from cardiovascular disease, including stroke and coronary heart disease The score is based on a large cohort of participants in controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs An individual's risk can be readily assessed as high or low compared with others of the same age and sex The website http://www.riskscore.org.uk/ is available for users of the risk score

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.75

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pocock, S. J., McCormack, V., Gueyffier, F., Boutitie, F., Fagard, R. H., & Boissel, J.-P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-07-14
Volume
323
Issue
7304
Pages
75-81
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2058206695
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.