Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure

Open access
Blue, Lynda, Lang, Elanor, McMurray, John J V, Davie, Andrew P, McDonagh, Theresa A, Murdoch, David R, Petrie, Mark C, Connolly, Eugene, Norrie, John, Round, Caroline E, Ford, Ian, Morrison, Caroline E·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether specialist nurse intervention improves outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Acute medical admissions unit in a teaching hospital. Participants: 165 patients admitted with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The intervention started before discharge and continued thereafter with home visits for up to 1 year. Main outcome measures: Time to first event analysis of death from all causes or readmission to hospital with worsening heart failure. Results: 31 patients (37%) in the intervention group died or were readmitted with heart failure compared with 45 (53%) in the usual care group (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.96).Compared with usual care, patients in the intervention group had fewer readmissions for any reason (86 v 114, P=0.018), fewer admissions for heart failure (19 v 45, P<0.001) and spent fewer days in hospital for heart failure (mean 3.43 v 7.46 days, P=0.0051). Conclusions: Specially trained nurses can improve the outcome of patients admitted to hospital with heart failure. What is already known on this topic: Studies have suggested that nurse intervention may reduce readmission in patients with heart failure What this study adds: Home based intervention from nurses reduces readmissions for worsening heart failure Regular contact to review treatment and patient education are likely to contribute to this effect

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.323.7315.715

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Blue, L., Lang, E., McMurray, J. J. V., Davie, A. P., McDonagh, T. A., Murdoch, D. R., Petrie, M. C., Connolly, E., Norrie, J., Round, C. E., Ford, I., & Morrison, C. E.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-09-29
Volume
323
Issue
7315
Pages
715-718
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1994299742
Cited by
600
References
8
FWCI
26.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.323.7315.715
The paper
Blue, L., Lang, E., McMurray, J. J. V., Davie, A. P., McDonagh, T. A., Murdoch, D. R., Petrie, M. C., Connolly, E., Norrie, J., Round, C. E., Ford, I., & Morrison, C. E. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7315.715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.