The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative
Open accessAbstract
Problem: Breastfeeding rates and related hospital practices need improvement in Italy and elsewhere. Training of staff is necessary, but its effectiveness needs assessment. Context: Eight hospitals in different regions of Italy. Design: Controlled, non-randomised study. Data collected in three phases. Training after the first phase in group 1 hospitals and after the second phase in group 2. Strategies for change: Training of trainers and subsequent training of health workers with a slightly adapted version of the 18 hour Unicef course on breastfeeding management and promotion. Key measures for improvement: Hospital practices, knowledge of 571 health workers, and breastfeeding rates at discharge, three, and six months in 2669 mother and baby pairs. Effects of change: After training hospitals improved their compliance with the “ten steps to successful breast feeding,” from an average of 2.4 steps at phase one to 7.7 at phase three. Knowledge scores of health professionals increased from 0.41 to 0.72 in group 1 (training after phase one) and from 0.53 to 0.75 in group 2 (after phase two). The rate of exclusive breast feeding at discharge increased significantly after training: 41% to 77% in group 1 and 23% to 73% in group 2, as did the rates of full (exclusive plus predominant) breast feeding at three months (37% to 50% in group 1 v 40% to 59% in group 2) and any breast feeding at six months (43% to 62% in group 1 v 41% to 64% in group 2). Lessons learnt: Training for at least three days with a course including practical sessions and counselling skills is effective in changing hospital practices, knowledge of health workers, and breastfeeding rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies
Renfrew, M. J., McCormick, F. M., Wade, A., Quinn, B., & Dowswell, T. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub4 · Cited by 665
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies
McFadden, A., Gavine, A., Renfrew, M. J., Wade, A., Buchanan, P., Taylor, J. L., Veitch, E., Rennie, A. M., Crowther, S. A., Neiman, S., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub5 · Cited by 581
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding
Balogun, O. O., O'Sullivan, E. J., McFadden, A., Ota, E., Gavine, A., Garner, C. D., Renfrew, M. J., & MacGillivray, S. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub3 · Cited by 455
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding
Dyson, L., McCormick, F. M., & Renfrew, M. J. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub2 · Cited by 167
Effect of early postnatal breastfeeding support: a cluster randomized community based trial
Kronborg, H., Væth, M., Olsen, J., Iversen, L., & Harder, I. (2007) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00341.x · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Cattaneo, A., & Buzzetti, R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-12-08
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 7325
- Pages
- 1358-1362
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2000731522
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1358
- The paper
- Cattaneo, A., & Buzzetti, R. (2001). Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.