Cited by 581Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Nutrition and Health

Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies

Open access
McFadden, Alison, Gavine, Anna, Renfrew, Mary J, Wade, Angela, Buchanan, Phyll, Taylor, Jane L, Veitch, Emma, Rennie, Anne Marie +3 more·2017·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

support versus usual care, Outcome 1 Stopping breastfeeding (any) before last study assessment up to 6 months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.2.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 2 Stopping exclusive breastfeeding before last study assessment up to 6 months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.3.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 3 Stopping breastfeeding (any) at up to 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.4.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 4 Stopping exclusive breastfeeding at up to 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.5.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 5 Sensitivity analysis by risk of bias allocation concealment: stopping any breastfeeding at up to six months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.6.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 6 Sensitivity analysis by risk of bias allocation concealment: stopping exclusive breastfeeding at up to six months. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.7.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 7 Sensitivity analysis by risk of bias allocation concealment: stopping any breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 1.8.Comparison 1 All forms of support versus usual care, Outcome 8 Sensitivity analysis by risk of bias allocation concealment: stopping exclusive breastfeeding by 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 2.1.Comparison 2 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -who delivered the intervention, Outcome 1 Stopping any breastfeeding before last study assessment up to 6 months. . . . . .Analysis 2.2.Comparison 2 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -who delivered the intervention, Outcome 2 Stopping exclusive breastfeeding before last study assessment. . . . . . . . .Analysis 2.3.Comparison 2 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -who delivered the intervention, Outcome 3 Stopping any breastfeeding at up to 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 2.4.Comparison 2 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -who delivered the intervention, Outcome 4 Stopping exclusive breastfeeding at up to 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 3.1.Comparison 3 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -type of support, Outcome 1 Stopping any breastfeeding before last study assessment up to 6 months. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 3.2.Comparison 3 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -type of support, Outcome 2 Stopping exclusive breastfeeding by last study assessment up to 6 months. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Analysis 3.3.Comparison 3 All forms of support versus usual care: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS -type of support, Outcome 3 Stopping any breastfeeding by 4-6 weeks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies (Review)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub5

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFadden, A., Gavine, A., Renfrew, M. J., Wade, A., Buchanan, P., Taylor, J. L., Veitch, E., Rennie, A. M., Crowther, S. A., Neiman, S., & MacGillivray, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Institute of Child Health; Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics; 30 Guilford St London UK WC1N 1 EH
  • Breastfeeding Network; Paisley Renfrewshire UK PA2 8YB
  • Aberdeen Maternity Hospital (GB)
  • Robert Gordon University (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
2017
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4297851026
Cited by
581
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
breastfeeding, breastfeeding support, exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding cessation, term infants, usual care comparison, allocation concealment, subgroup analysis, breastfeeding duration, infant feeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review