The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan: cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objective: To assess the effects on self rated health of individual income and income distribution in Japan. Design: Cross sectional analysis. Data collected on household income, self rated health, and other sociodemographic characteristics at the individual level from comprehensive survey of the living conditions of people on health and welfare in a nationally representative sample from each prefecture. Setting: Prefectures in Japan. Participants: 80 899 people aged >15 years with full records in survey. Main outcome measures: Dichotomous variable for self rated health of each respondent (0 if excellent, very good or good; 1 if fair or poor). Results: Inequality in income at the prefecture level measured by the Gini coefficient was comparable with that in other industrialised countries. Unadjusted odds ratios show a 14% increased risk (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.27) in reporting poor or fair health for individuals living in prefectures with higher inequality in income. After adjustment, individual income was more strongly associated with self rated health than income inequality. Additional inclusion of regional effects showed that median income at the prefecture level was inversely related to self rated health. Conclusions: Individual income, probably relative to the median prefecture income, has a stronger association with self rated health than income inequality at the prefecture level. What is already known on this topic Contrary to the common perception of an egalitarian society, income inequality in Japan has increased rapidly since the late 1980s, though life expectancy continues to increase Individual level studies, exclusively carried out in the United States to assess the independent effects of income inequality on health, have had mixed results What this study adds Individual income levels, probably relative to regional median income, may have more influence on an individual9s perceived health than regional income inequality in Japan
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598
Cited by
Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review
LYNCH, J., SMITH, G. D., HARPER, S., HILLEMEIER, M., ROSS, N., KAPLAN, G. A., & WOLFSON, M. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00302.x · Cited by 938
Income inequality and health: multilevel analysis of Chilean communities
Subramanian, S. V., Delgado, I., Jadue, L., Vega, J., & Kawachi, I. (2003) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.57.11.844 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Shibuya, K., Hashimoto, H., & Yano, E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-01-05
- Volume
- 324
- Issue
- 7328
- Pages
- 16-16
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2138567867
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan: cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7328.16
- The paper
- Shibuya, K., Hashimoto, H., & Yano, E. (2002). Individual income, income distribution, and self rated health in Japan: cross sectional analysis of nationally representative sample. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7328.16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.