Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey

Open access
Quine, Lyn·2002·BMJ

Abstract

sion incident in 1996, owing to logistical difficulties.Two units mentioned difficulties in tracking patients who had been referred to general practice; one unit reverted to immunisation through dialysis services rather than primary care after seroconversion of a patient who had been referred.Six units mentioned costs and funding as barriers.One unit thought our survey would encourage provision of funding.We thank all UK renal units who completed the study questionnaire and the staff at the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.878

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Quine, L.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-04-13
Volume
324
Issue
7342
Pages
878-879
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2088381260
Cited by
256
References
6
FWCI
42.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.878
The paper
Quine, L. (2002). Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.