Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?

Open access
Johanson, Richard, Newburn, Mary, Macfarlane, Alison·2002·BMJ

Abstract

Over the past few centuries childbirth has become increasingly influenced by medical technology, and now medical intervention is the norm in most Western countries. Richard Johanson and colleagues argue here that perhaps normal birth has become too “medicalised” and that higher rates of normal birth are in fact associated with beliefs about birth, implementation of evidence based practice, and team working Until the 17th century, birth in most parts of the world was firmly in the exclusively female domestic arena, and hospital birth was uncommon before the 20th century, except in a few major cities. 1 2 Before the invention of forceps, men had been involved only in difficult deliveries, using destructive instruments with the result that babies were invariably not born alive and the mother too would often die. Instrumental delivery with forceps became the hallmark of the obstetric era. In the 19th and 20th centuries, medical influence was extended further by the development of new forms of analgesia, anaesthesia, caesarean section, and safe blood transfusion. The introduction first of antiseptic and aseptic techniques and later of sulphonamides, coupled with changes in the severity of puerperal sepsis, lowered the maternal mortality that had made hospitals dangerous places in which to give birth.3 #### Summary points Obstetricians play an important role in preserving lives when there are complications of pregnancy or labour In developed countries, however, obstetrician involvement and medical interventions have become routine in normal childbirth, without evidence of effectiveness Factors associated with increased obstetric intervention seem to include private practice, medicolegal pressures, and not involving women fully in decision making Emerging evidence suggests that higher rates of normal births are linked to beliefs about birth, implementation of evidence based practice, and team working Maternal mortality in the West fell substantially during the 20th century. The World Health Organization and Unicef …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Loudon I .Death in childbirth. Oxford:Clarendon Press,1992. · DOI
  2. Loudon I .The tragedy of childbed fever. Oxford:OUP,2000. · DOI · Paper page
  3. AbouZahr C .Maternal mortality overview. In: Murray CJL Lopez A , eds. Health dimensions of sex and reproduction: the global burden of sexually transmitted diseases, HIV, maternal conditions, perinatal disorders, and congenital anomalies. Cambridge, MA.:Harvard School of Public Health,1998. (Global burden of disease and injury series. Vol 3.)
  4. Kaunitz, 1984, Perinatal and maternal mortality in a religious group avoiding obstetric care., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 150, 826, 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90457-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1542/peds.99.3.415 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Paranjothy S, Thomas J, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit .National sentinel caesarean section audit report. London:RCOG Press,2001.
  7. Hopkins, 2000, Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean?, Soc Sci Med, 51, 725, 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00480-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bosch, 1998, Spanish doctors criticised for high tech births., BMJ, 317, 1406, 10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1406b · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7170.1406b
  9. Glazener, 1995, Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment., Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 102, 282, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09132.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1081 · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1081
  11. Wiley S .We'll never forget agony.Nottingham Evening News 2000 Oct 19.
  12. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00315-4 · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00315-4
  13. 10.1054/midw.1999.0201 · doi:10.1054/midw.1999.0201
  14. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01139.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Thacker SB Stroup DF Chang M .Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation for assessment during labor.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(1):CD000063. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Newburn, 2002, A birth policy for the National Childbirth Trust., MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 12, 122
  17. Moulla J Walton C .Albany midwifery practice information and statistics (1997-1999).Presented at midwifery models of excellence conference,17 May 2000.
  18. Waldenstrom, 1998, A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services., Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105, 1160, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09969.x · DOI
  19. Farquhar M Camilleri-Ferrante C Todd C .An evaluation of midwifery teams in west Essex. Final report. Cambridge:University of Cambridge,1996.
  20. 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00022-X · doi:10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00022-x · Paper page
  21. Saunders D Boulton M Chapple J .Evaluation of the Edgware Birth Centre. In: London:North Thames Perinatal Public Health,2000.
  22. Waldenstrom, 1997, The Stockholm birth centre trial. Maternal and infant outcome., Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104, 410, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11491.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Johanson, R., Newburn, M., & Macfarlane, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-04-13
Volume
324
Issue
7342
Pages
892-895
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2074672693
Cited by
447
References
2
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892
The paper
Johanson, R., Newburn, M., & Macfarlane, A. (2002). Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.