Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomised controlled trial of behavioural infant sleep intervention to improve infant sleep and maternal mood

Open access
Hiscock, H, Wake, M·2002·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of a behavioural sleep intervention with written information about normal sleep on infant sleep problems and maternal depression. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Well child clinics, Melbourne, Australia Participants: 156 mothers of infants aged 6-12 months with severe sleep problems according to the parents. Main outcome measures: Maternal report of infant sleep problem; scores on Edinburgh postnatal depression scale at two and four months. Intervention: Discussion on behavioural infant sleep intervention (controlled crying) delivered over three consultations. Results: At two months more sleep problems had resolved in the intervention group than in the control group (53/76 v 36/76, P=0.005). Overall depression scores fell further in the intervention group than in the control group (mean change 3.7, 95% confidence interval 4.7 to 2.7, v 2.5, 1.7 to 3.4, P=0.06). For the subgroup of mothers with depression scores of 10 and over more sleep problems had resolved in the intervention group than in the control group (26/33 v 13/33, P=0.001). In this subgroup depression scores also fell further for intervention mothers than control mothers at two months ( 6.0, 7.5 to 4.0, v 3.7, 4.9 to 2.6, P=0.01) and at four months ( 6.5, 7.9 to 5.1 v −4.2, −5.9 to 2.5, P=0.04). By four months, changes in sleep problems and depression scores were similar. Conclusions: Behavioural intervention significantly reduces infant sleep problems at two but not four months. Maternal report of symptoms of depression decreased significantly at two months, and this was sustained at four months for mothers with high depression scores. What is already known on this topic: Infant sleep problems and postnatal depression are both common potentially serious problems Women whose infants have sleep problems are more likely to report symptoms of depression Uncontrolled studies in clinical populations suggest that reducing infant sleep problems improves postnatal depression, but there is no good quality evidence in the community for such effectiveness What this study adds: A brief community based sleep intervention based on teaching the controlled crying method effectively decreased infant sleep problems and symptoms of maternal depression, particularly for “depressed” mothers The intervention was acceptable to mothers and reduced the need for other sources of help

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1062

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Hiscock, H., & Wake, M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-05-04
Volume
324
Issue
7345
Pages
1062
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2161528511
Cited by
317
References
29
FWCI
32.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial of behavioural infant sleep intervention to improve infant sleep and maternal mood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1062
The paper
Hiscock, H., & Wake, M. (2002). Randomised controlled trial of behavioural infant sleep intervention to improve infant sleep and maternal mood. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.