The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity
Open accessAbstract
As a response to concerns about the standard of qualitative research, attention has focused on the methods used. However, this may constrain the direction and content of qualitative studies and legitimise substandard research. Helen Lambert and Christopher McKevitt explain why anthropology may be able to contribute useful insights to health research Qualitative methods are now common in research into the social and cultural dimensions of ill health and health care. These methods derive from several social sciences, but the concepts and knowledge from some disciplinary traditions are underused. Here we describe the potential contribution of anthropology, which is based on the empirical comparison of particular societies. Anthropology has biological, social, and cultural branches, but when applied to health issues it most commonly relates to the social and cultural dimensions of health, ill health, and medicine.1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42 · Cited by 2,336
Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider?
Krieger, N. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90202-x · Cited by 1,419
Cited by
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.742775 · Cited by 1,085
Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine
Lambert, H. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.023 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThe qualitative orientation in medical education research
Cleland, J. A. (2017) · Korean Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.53 · Cited by 282
Qualitative Studies of Stroke: A Systematic Review
McKevitt, C., Redfern, J., Mold, F., & Wolfe, C. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000127532.64840.36 · Cited by 247
Self-citationAssessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study
Fudge, N., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39456.552257.be · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert, H., & McKevitt, C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-07-27
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 7357
- Pages
- 210-213
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2087724072
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 44.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.325.7357.210
- The paper
- Lambert, H., & McKevitt, C. (2002). Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7357.210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.