Cited by 154Health Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementationAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Cluster randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections in women and sore throat

Open access
Flottorp, Signe, Oxman, Andrew D, Håvelsrud, Kari, Treweek, Shaun, Herrin, Jeph·2002·BMJ

Abstract

Objective :To assess the effectiveness of tailored interventions to implement guidelines for urinary tract infections in women and sore throat Design :Unblinded, cluster randomised pretest-post-test trial Setting :142 general practices in Norway Participants :72 practices received interventions to implement guidelines for urinary tract infection and 70 practices received interventions to implement guidelines for sore throat, serving as controls for each other. 59 practices in the urinary tract infection group and 61 practices in the sore throat group completed the study. Outcomes were measured in 16 939 consultations for sore throat and 9887 consultations for urinary tract infection. Interventions :Interventions were developed to overcome identified barriers to implementing the guidelines. The main components of the tailored interventions were patient educational material, computer based decision support and reminders, an increase in the fee for telephone consultations, and interactive courses for general practitioners and practice assistants Main outcome measures :Changes in rates of use of antibiotics, laboratory tests, and telephone consultations Results :Patients in the sore throat group were 3% less likely to receive antibiotics after the intervention. Women with symptoms of urinary tract infection in the intervention group were 5.1% less likely to have a laboratory test ordered. No significant differences were found between the groups for the other outcomes. Large variation was found across the included practicesin the rates of antibiotic prescription, use of laboratory tests and telephone consultations, and in the extent of change for all three outcome measures Conclusions :Passively delivered, complex interventions targeted at identified barriers to change had little effect in changing practice

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.367

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the seven studies that received no control intervention, the pooled odds ratio was 1.36 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.99, P = 0.099).

    “Of these, seven were suitable for inclusion in a meta‐regression, and the pooled odds ratio for the seven studies that received no control intervention was 1.36 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.99, P value = 0.099) (Avorn 1992; Callahan 1994; Flottorp 2002; Looijmans 2010; Murphy 2009; Scott 2013; Schouten 2007).”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Flottorp 2002

  • The overall risk of bias for Flottorp 2002 was unclear.

    “Risk of bias overall Unclear risk Allocation concealment”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Flottorp 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997;315:418-21.
  2. Flottorp S, Oxman AD, Cooper JG, Hjortdahl P, Sandberg S, Vorland LH. Retningslinjer for diagnostikk og behandling av sår hals. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2000;120:1754-60.
  3. Lamberts H, Wood M, Hofmans-Okkes I, eds. The international classification of primary care in the European Community, with a multi-language layer. Oxford: Oxford Medical, 1993.
  4. Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Analysis of a cluster randomized trial with binary outcome data using a multi-level model. Stat Med 2000;19:2675- 88.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flottorp, S., Oxman, A. D., Håvelsrud, K., Treweek, S., & Herrin, J.
Affiliations
Norwegian Directorate of Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Flottorp, Signe
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-08-17
Volume
325
Issue
7360
Pages
367
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2146745032
Cited by
154
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
23.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
urinary tract infection, sore throat, guideline implementation, personalized interventions, general practice, antibiotic prescribing, telephone consultation, computer-based decision support, patient education, barriers to change, primary care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Norway, Pharyngitis, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Urinary Tract Infections, Cluster Analysis, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review