Cited by 284Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementPrimary Care and Health OutcomesClinical practice guidelines implementation

Barriers to accurate diagnosis and effective management of heart failure in primary care: qualitative study

Open access
Fuat, Ahmet, Hungin, A Pali S, Murphy, Jeremy James·2003·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the beliefs, current practices, and decision making of general practitioners in the diagnosis and management of suspected heart failure in primary care, with a view to identifying barriers to good care. Design: A qualitative approach using focus groups with 30 general practitioners from four primary care groups. The sampling strategy was stratified and purposive. The contents of interviews were transcribed and analysed according to the principles of “pragmatic variant” grounded theory. Setting: North east England. Results: Three categories of difficulties contribute to variations in medical practice and to the reasons why general practitioners experience difficulties in diagnosing and managing heart failure. The first is uncertainty about clinical practice, including lack of confidence in establishing an accurate diagnosis and worries about using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, β blockers, and spironolactone in patients who are often elderly and frail, with comorbidity and polypharmacy. The second is a lack of awareness of relevant research evidence in what was perceived to be a complex and rapidly changing therapeutic field. Doubts about the applicability of research findings in primary care, and fear of information overload also emerged. The third category consists of influences of individual preference and local organisational factors. Medical training, negative clinical experiences, and outside agencies influenced the behaviour of general practitioners and professional culture. Local factors included the availability of diagnostic services, resources (such as accessible cardiologists), and interactions between professionals in primary or secondary care, and they seemed to shape the practice and decision making processes in primary care. Conclusions: The national service framework for coronary heart disease stresses that the substandard care of patients with heart failure is unacceptable. This study identified barriers to be overcome across primary and secondary care in implementation strategies that are specific to the locality and multifaceted. Single strategies—for example, the provision of guidelines—are unlikely to have an impact on clinical outcomes, and new, conjoint models of care need to be explored. What is already known on this topic: Heart failure is a common condition with a high morbidity and mortality and is largely managed in primary care Although modern management with accurate diagnosis and treatment improves prognosis considerably, unacceptable variations exist in the clinical application of current guidelines for heart failure What this study adds: General practitioners expressed a lack of confidence in establishing an accurate diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, even if open access echocardiography was available Uncertainty about diagnosis led to poor uptake of evidence based treatment strategies for heart failure patients, and, despite awareness, reluctance to initiate modern treatment Local organisational factors around NHS provision of diagnostic services, resources, and interaction between primary and secondary care influence how general practitioners manage heart failure Implementation strategies for heart failure management across primary and secondary care are needed that are specific to their locality and multifaceted

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.196

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McMurray J, Hart W, Rhodes G. An evaluation of the economic cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Br J Med Econ 1993;6:99-110.
  2. Toal M, Walker R. ACE inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure in gen- eral practice in north Cumbria. Eur J Heart Fail 2000;2:201-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuat, A., Hungin, A. P. S., & Murphy, J. J.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fuat, Ahmet
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-01-25
Volume
326
Issue
7382
Pages
196
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2161111685
Cited by
284
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
heart failure, general practitioners, primary care, barriers to diagnosis, guideline uptake, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, spironolactone, polypharmacy, frail elderly patients, implementation strategies, professional culture, National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease, quality of care
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cardiac Output, Low, Decision Making, Echocardiography, England, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review