Cited by 196Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyFoot and Ankle Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ruling a diagnosis in or out with “SpPIn” and “SnNOut”: a note of caution

Open access

Abstract

Dr X is back from her annual leave.Dr Y, the locum doctor, reports on the patients he saw during her absence, including a 40 year old teacher who had sprained her right ankle.Returning from a conference, she had stumbled while walking down the stairs with a heavy bag.Examination revealed a moderately swollen lateral right ankle.The patient was able to walk but was clearly in pain.Her breath smelt of alcohol.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.209

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82656-3 · DOI
  2. Fagan, 1975, Nomogram for Bayes theorem., N Engl J Med, 293, 257, 10.1056/NEJM197507312930513 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70233-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.536 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.015 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70093-9 · DOI
  7. Simel, 1988, Quantitating bedside diagnosis: clinical evaluation of ascites., J Gen Intern Med, 3, 423, 10.1007/BF02595917 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/archneur.1978.00500250041009 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/jnnp.66.2.184 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2337/diacare.22.2.307 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417 · DOI
  12. 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Guarino, 1994, Auscultatory percussion: a simple method to detect pleural effusion., J Gen Intern Med, 9, 71, 10.1007/BF02600204 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90061-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1378/chest.97.4.776 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/qjmed/90.5.335 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01559.x · DOI
  18. 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010 · DOI
  19. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, University of Oxford. SpPins and SnNouts. www.cebm.net/sppins_snnouts.asp (accessed January 2003).
  20. 10.1001/jama.1992.03480190087038 · DOI
  21. 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41/a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pewsner, D., Battaglia, M., Minder, C., Marx, A., Bucher, H. C., & Egger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Egger, Matthias
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-07-22
Volume
329
Issue
7459
Pages
209-213
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1997194058
Cited by
196
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
diagnostic accuracy, ankle sprain, lateral ankle sprain, diagnostic test interpretation
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Orthopedics, Probability, Sensitivity and Specificity, Bias, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review