Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria in the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia

Varma, A R, Snowden, J S, Lloyd, J J, Talbot, P R, Mann, D M A, Neary, D·1999·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.66.2.184

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Gustafson L. Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. II. Clinical picture and diVerential diagnosis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1987;6:209-23.
  2. Neary D, Snowden JS, Northen B, et al. Dementia of frontal lobe type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:353-61.
  3. Berg L, Morris JC. Diagnosis. In: Terry RD, Katzman R, Bick KL, eds. Alzheimer disease. New York: Raven Press, 1994:9-25.
  4. Trimble MR. The dementias. In: Trimble MR. Biological psychiatry. Chichester: John Wiley, 1996:291-324.
  5. Mendez MF, Selwood A, Mastri AR, et al. Pick's disease versus Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of clinical charac- teristics. Neurology 1993;43:289-92.
  6. Klatka LA, SchiVer RB, Powers JM, et al. Incorrect diagno- sis of Alzheimer's disease, a clinicopathological study. Arch Neurol 1996;53:35-42.
  7. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diag- nosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS- ADRDA Work Group under the Auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-44.
  8. Neary D, Snowden JS, Bowen DM, et al. Neuropsychologi- cal syndromes in presenile dementia due to cerebral atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;49:163-74.
  9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
  10. Black WC, Armstrong P. Communicating the significance of radiologic test results: the likelihood ratio. American Journal of Radiology 1986;147:1313-8.
  11. Mann DMA. The topographical distribution of brain pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1991;83:81-6.
  12. Mann DMA, South PW, Snowden JS, et al. Dementia of frontal lobe type; neuropathology and immunohistochem- istry. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:605-14.
  13. Mann DMA, South PW. The topographic distribution of brain atrophy in frontal lobe dementia. Acta Neuropatho- logica 1993;83:334-40.
  14. Brun A, Englund B, Gustafson L, et al. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. The Lund and Manchester Groups. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-8.
  15. Galasko D, Hansen LA, Katzman R, et al. Clinical- neuropathological correlations in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Arch Neurol 1994;51:888-95.
  16. Kukull WA, Larson EB, Reifler BV, et al. The validity of three clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1990;40:1364-9.
  17. Boller F, Lopez OL, Moossy J. Diagnosis of dementia: clin- icopathological correlations. Neurology 1989;39:76-9.
  18. Litvan I, Agid Y, Sastrj N, et al. What are the obstacles for an accurate clinical diagnosis of Pick's disease? A clinico- pathological study. Neurology 1997;49:62-9.
  19. Snowden JS. Contribution to the diVerential diagnosis of dementias.1: Neuropsychology. Reviews in Clinical Geron- tology 1994;4:227-34.
  20. Scoville WB, Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20:11-21.
  21. Moss MB, Albert MS, Butters N, et al. DiVerential patterns of memory loss among patients with Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease and alcoholic KorsakoV's syndrome. Arch Neurol 1986;43:239-46.
  22. Milner B. Some eVects of frontal lobectomy in man. In: JM Warren, K Abert, eds. The frontal granular cortex and behav- iour. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964:313-31.
  23. Stuss DT, Benson FD. Attention. In: Stuss DT, Benson FD, eds. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press, 1986:97-106.
  24. Barber R, Snowden JS, Craufurd D. Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: retrospective diVeren- tiation using information from informants. J Neurol Neuro- surg Psychiatry 1995;59:61-70.
  25. McKeith IG, Fairbairn AF, Perry RF, et al. The clinical diagnosis and misdiagnosis of senile dementia of Lewy body type (SDLT). Br J Psychiatry 1994;165:324-32.
  26. Talbot PR, Snowden JS, Lloyd JJ, et al. The contribution of single photon emission tomography to clinical diVerentia- tion of degenerative cortical brain disorders. J Neurol 1995; 242:579-86.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Varma, A. R., Snowden, J. S., Lloyd, J. J., Talbot, P. R., Mann, D. M. A., & Neary, D.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
184-188
ISSN
0022-3050
Cited by
238
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review