Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems?

Open access
Wade, Derick T, Halligan, Peter W·2004·BMJ

Abstract

Summary Hypoxia is a common feature of many solid tumors due to aberrant proliferation and angiogenesis and has been associated with tumor progression and metastasis. Most of the well- known hypoxia effects are mediated through hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), but the long- lasting effect of hypoxia beyond the immediate HIF regulation remains less understood. Here we show that hypoxia exerts a prolonged effect through HIF-independent mechanisms to promote metastasis. Using breast cancer patient-derived circulating tumor cell (CTC) lines and common breast cancer cell lines, we found that hypoxia downregulates tumor intrinsic type I interferon (IFN) signaling and its downstream antigen presentation (AP) machinery in luminal breast cancer cells. This effect does not depend on the canonical HIFs but is mediated, at least partially, via forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1). Moreover, hypoxia induced IFN/AP suppression can last longer than the hypoxic exposure, presenting a “hypoxic memory” phenotype. Hypoxic memory of IFN/AP downregulation is established by specific hypoxic priming, and cells with hypoxic memory have an enhanced ability for tumorigenesis and metastasis. The histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) Entinostat can erase the hypoxic memory and improve the immune clearance of tumor cells when combined with checkpoint immunotherapies in a syngeneic breast cancer mouse model. These results point to a novel mechanism for hypoxia facilitated tumor progression, through a long-lasting memory that provides advantages for CTCs during the metastatic cascade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-12-09
Volume
329
Issue
7479
Pages
1398-1401
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2072603679
Cited by
471
References
1
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398
The paper
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2004). Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1398

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.