Cited by 88Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareHealthcare Quality and Management

Satisfaction with pregnancy and birth services: The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women

Goberna-Tricas, Josefina, Banús-Giménez, Ma. Rosa, Palacio-Tauste, Alicia, Linares-Sancho, Sara·2011·Midwifery

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the opinions of women regarding satisfaction with the quality of maternity care received, and to establish whether health-care technology increases satisfaction or interferes with the construction of personal satisfaction in the process of care.Design and setting Information was gathered using focus groups. The area of study comprised the postnatal groups run as part of the Sexual and Reproductive Health Programme of the Catalan Health Authority, Spain.Participants Five focus groups were held between May 2006 and July 2007.Findings Quality of care is a complex concept in which a number of independent core features can be identified. These core features were grouped into three basic categories: safety (the hospital and its technological facilities, and the technical expertise of health professionals), the relationship between the carers and the service user, and the structural aspects that determine the context in which health care is provided.Key conclusions and implications for practice The mothers in this study were satisfied with health-care technology and viewed it as a source of security. Technology was indispensable to reduce the anxiety provoked by their perceived lack of confidence in their ability as mothers. During pregnancy and, especially, when giving birth, women believe that their feelings and values should be understood by professionals, from whom they seek empathy and personal commitment, not just information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.004

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goberna-Tricas, J., Banús-Giménez, M. R., Palacio-Tauste, A., & Linares-Sancho, S.
Affiliations
Institut Català de la Salut (ES)
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
e231-e237
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972781818
Cited by
88
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (acceptedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Universitat de Barcelona
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
patient satisfaction, obstetric care, quality of care, childbirth, pregnancy, health technology, caregiver-patient relationship, postpartum care, maternal anxiety, professional empathy, women's experiences
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Mothers, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Spain, Nursing Evaluation Research, Patient Satisfaction, Focus Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review