Cited by 88Innovations in Medical EducationMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

What should undergraduate medical students know about psoriasis? Involving patients in curriculum development: modified Delphi technique

Open access
Alahlafi, Abdelaziz, Burge, Susan·2005·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the content of a psoriasis curriculum for medical students. DESIGN: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. SETTING: Primary and secondary care in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire. SUBJECTS: 19 dermatologists (7 teaching hospital consultants; 6 consultants in district general hospitals; 6 registrars); 2 general practitioner senior house officers working in dermatology, 5 dermatology nurses, 7 rheumatologists, 25 general practitioner tutors, and 25 patients with chronic psoriasis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of agreement by participants to items derived from literature and our existing psoriasis syllabus. RESULTS: 71 (84.5%) of 84 questionnaires were returned. A 75% level of consensus was reached on key items that focused on the common presentations of psoriasis, impact, management, and communication skills. Students should be aware of the psychosocial impact of psoriasis, examine the skin while showing sensitivity, and be able to explain psoriasis to patients in a way that enables patients to explain the condition to others. CONCLUSIONS: The panels identified the important items for a psoriasis curriculum. The views of patients were particularly helpful, and we encourage educators to involve patients with chronic diseases in developing curriculums in the future. The method and results could be generalised to curriculum development in chronic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.633

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Howe A, Anderson J. Involving patients in medical education. BMJ 2003;327:326-8.
  2. Shaw S. Expertise and chronicity: How are patients presented in the curriculum. Focus Health Profess Educ 2002;4:33-46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alahlafi, A., & Burge, S.
Affiliations
Churchill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Burge, Susan
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-03-17
Volume
330
Issue
7492
Pages
633-636
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2141485407
Cited by
88
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
psoriasis, undergraduate medical education, curriculum development, patient involvement, patient perspectives, communication skills, patient education, chronic disease, dermatology education
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Delphi Technique, Dermatology, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, England, Humans, Patient Participation, Psoriasis, Students, Medical, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review