Cited by 195Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Revisiting Rose: strategies for reducing coronary heart disease

Open access
Manuel, Douglas G, Lim, Jenny, Tanuseputro, Peter, Anderson, Geoffrey M, Alter, David A, Laupacis, Andreas, Mustard, Cameron A·2006·BMJ

Abstract

The way we assess risk of coronary heart disease has become more accurate in recent years. How does this affect the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.332.7542.659

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The population strategy was long considered more cost-effective than the high-risk approach, but since the introduction of highly effective lipid-lowering drugs, improved smoking cessation programmes, and lower costs of antihypertensive drugs, the effectiveness of the high-risk approach has increased.

    “For a long time the population strategy has been considered to be more costeffective than the high-risk approach but since the introduction of highly effective lipid lowering drugs, improvement in smoking cessation programmes and lower costs of antihypertensive drugs, the effectiveness of the high risk approach has increased.20”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manuel, D. G., Lim, J., Tanuseputro, P., Anderson, G. M., Alter, D. A., Laupacis, A., & Mustard, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Institute for Work & Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Manuel, Douglas G
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-03-16
Volume
332
Issue
7542
Pages
659-662
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1963936146
Cited by
195
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk assessment, primary prevention, secondary prevention, risk stratification, prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Coronary Disease, Health Policy, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review