The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in expectations for health using anchoring vignettes, which describe fixed levels of health on dimensions such as mobility. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of adults living in the community. SETTING: China, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates. PARTICIPANTS: 3012 men and women aged 18 years and older (self ratings); subsample of 406 (vignette ratings). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self rated mobility levels and ratings of hypothetical vignettes using the same questions and response categories. RESULTS: Consistent rankings of vignettes are evidence that vignettes are understood in similar ways in different settings, and internal consistency of orderings on two mobility questions indicates good comprehension. Variation in vignette ratings across age groups suggests that expectations for mobility decline with age. Comparison of responses to two different mobility questions supports the assumption that individual ratings of hypothetical vignettes relate to expectations for health in similar ways as self assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Anchoring vignettes could provide a powerful tool for understanding and adjusting for the influence of different health expectations on self ratings of health. Incorporating anchoring vignettes in surveys can improve the comparability of self reported measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey
Kind, P., Dolan, P., Gudex, C., & Williams, A. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J. A., Abdalla, S., Aboyans, V., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61729-2 · Cited by 8,291
Self-citationVos, T., Allen, C., Arora, M., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Brown, A., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Chen, A. Z., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31678-6 · Cited by 7,253
Self-citationKassebaum, N. J., Arora, M., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Brown, J., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Coates, M. M., Coggeshall, M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31460-x · Cited by 2,163
Self-citationMeasuring the global burden of disease
Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1201534 · Cited by 1,818
Salomon, J. A., Wang, H., Freeman, M. K., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Lopez, A. D., & Murray, C. J. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61690-0 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Salomon, J. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-01-31
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 7434
- Pages
- 258-0
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2118023522
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.37963.691632.44
- The paper
- Salomon, J. A. (2004). Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37963.691632.44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
