The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease: population based cohort study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risks of malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease compared with the general population. DESIGN: Population based cohort study. SETTING: General practice research database. PARTICIPANTS: 4732 people with coeliac disease and 23,620 matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios for malignancy and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 4732 people with coeliac disease, 134 (2.8%) had at least one malignancy and 237 (5.0%) died. The overall hazard ratios were: for any malignancy 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.55), for mortality 1.31 (1.13 to 1.51), for gastrointestinal cancer 1.85 (1.22 to 2.81), for breast cancer 0.35 (0.17 to 0.72), for lung cancer 0.34 (0.13 to 0.95), and for lymphoproliferative disease 4.80 (2.71 to 8.50). The increased risk was primarily in the first year after diagnosis, with the risk for only lymphoproliferative disease remaining significantly raised thereafter. After excluding events in the year after diagnosis, the hazard ratio for malignancy was 1.10 (0.87 to 1.39) and for mortality was 1.17 (0.98 to 1.38), giving absolute excess rates of 6 and 17 per 10,000 person years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: People with coeliac disease have modest increases in overall risks of malignancy and mortality. Most of this excess risk occurs in the year of follow up after diagnosis. People with coeliac disease also have a noticeably reduced risk of breast cancer. The mechanism of this merits further attention as it may provide insights into the cause of this common malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jick, H., Jick, S. S., & Derby, L. E. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6779.766 · Cited by 839
Cited by
Lebwohl, B., Sanders, D. S., & Green, P. H. R. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31796-8 · Cited by 1,065
Type 1 diabetes associated autoimmunity: natural history, genetic associations and screening
Barker, J. M. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1679 · Cited by 350
A Simple Validated Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Survey for Adults With Celiac Disease
Leffler, D. A., Dennis, M., Edwards George, J. B., Jamma, S., Magge, S., Cook, E. F., Schuppan, D., & Kelly, C. P. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.032 · Cited by 327
Long‐term follow‐up of coeliac disease – what do coeliac patients want?
BEBB, J. R., LAWSON, A., KNIGHT, T., & LONG, R. G. (2006) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02824.x · Cited by 70
Pinto-Sanchez, M. I., Verdu, E. F., Gordillo, M. C., Bai, J. C., Birch, S., Moayyedi, P., & Bercik, P. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1155/2015/508156 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- West, J., Logan, R. F. A., Smith, C. J., Hubbard, R. B., & Card, T. R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-07-21
- Volume
- 329
- Issue
- 7468
- Pages
- 716-719
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2155807568
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.