The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether screening Danish men aged 65 or more for abdominal aortic aneurysms reduces mortality. DESIGN: Single centre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: All five hospitals in Viborg County, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All 12,639 men born during 1921-33 and living in Viborg County. In 1994 we included men born 1921-9 (64-73 years). We also included men who became 65 during 1995-8. INTERVENTIONS: Men were randomised to the intervention group (screening by abdominal ultrasonography) or control group. Participants with an abdominal aortic aneurysm > 5 cm were referred for surgical evaluation, and those with smaller aneurysms were offered annual scans. OUTCOME MEASURES: Specific mortality due to abdominal aortic aneurysm, overall mortality, and number of planned and emergency operations for abdominal aortic aneurysms. RESULTS: 4860 of 6333 men were screened (attendance rate 76.6%). 191 (4.0% of those screened) had abdominal aortic aneurysms. The mean follow-up time was 52 months. The screened group underwent 75% (95% confidence interval 51% to 91%) fewer emergency operations than the control group. Deaths due to abdominal aortic aneurysms occurred in nine patients in the screened group and 27 in the control group. The number needed to screen to save one life was 352. Specific mortality was significantly reduced by 67% (29% to 84%). Mortality due to non-abdominal aortic aneurysms was non-significantly reduced by 8%. The benefits of screening may increase with time. CONCLUSION: Mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Danish men aged 65 or more reduces mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
Vasan, R. S. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.482570 · Cited by 1,212
Wanhainen, A., Van Herzeele, I., Bastos Goncalves, F., Bellmunt Montoya, S., Berard, X., Boyle, J. R., D’Oria, M., Prendes, C. F., Karkos, C. D., Kazimierczak, A., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002 · Cited by 1,207
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases
Mazzolai, L., Teixido-Tura, G., Lanzi, S., Boc, V., Bossone, E., Brodmann, M., Bura-Rivière, A., De Backer, J., Deglise, S., Della Corte, A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 · Cited by 993
Svensjö, S., Björck, M., Gürtelschmid, M., Djavani Gidlund, K., Hellberg, A., & Wanhainen, A. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.030379 · Cited by 466
Lindholt, J. S., & Søgaard, R. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32250-x · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindholt, J. S., Juul, S., Fasting, H., & Henneberg, E. W.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-03-09
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 7494
- Pages
- 750
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2147602225
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82
- The paper
- Lindholt, J. S., Juul, S., Fasting, H., & Henneberg, E. W. (2005). Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.