Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative β blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Devereaux, P J, Beattie, W Scott, Choi, Peter T-L, Badner, Neal H, Guyatt, Gordon H, Villar, Juan C, Cinà, Claudio S, Leslie, Kate, Jacka, Michael J, Montori, Victor M, Bhandari, Mohit, Avezum, Alvaro, Cavalcanti, Alexandre B, Giles, Julian W, Schricker, Thomas, Yang, Homer, Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, Yusuf, Salim·2005·BMJ

Abstract

Introduction Little is published on the health impact of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) on patients. We aimed to assess the gastrointestinal and wider health burden of IBS-D, including medications used for symptom relief and perceived care shortfalls. Method A 30 min online survey was completed in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Canada and Australia. Target sample size was 80 patients per country. Screening criteria included: age 18–65 years, being diagnosed with IBS-D by a doctor, having symptoms present within the past 12 months, and currently using prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medicines for IBS-D. The maximum quota was 30% male and 25% of patients who had never seen a gastroenterologist for their IBS. Attitudes to IBS-D and its management were scored using a 7-point scale (Table). Results 513 eligible patients completed the survey; 357 (70%) were female and mean age was 40.9 (range 18–65) years. As well as stomach pain and diarrhoea, 269 (52%) patients had bloating before treatment, 204 (40%) had urgency and 88 (17%) had faecal incontinence. Mean duration of symptoms was 9.8 years. The most troublesome current symptom was urgency in 136 (27%) patients. In the past 3 months, symptoms were intermittent in 390 (76%) patients and continual in 123 (24%). The most common comorbidities were anxiety in 189 (37%) patients, depression in 137 (27%) and migraine in 133 (26%). OTC drugs were used by 372 (73%) patients (214 [42%] OTC only, 158 [31%] OTC + prescription). The most commonly used agents were antidiarrhoeals in 416 (81%) patients and antispasmodics in 300 (58%); notably, 91 (18%) used codeine-based painkillers and 79 (15%) used antidepressants. Antidiarrhoeals were used daily by 63 (12%) patients and 58 (11%) used daily antispasmodics; 178/384 (46%) and 99/217 (46%) were not satisfied with these agents. Patients had mixed attitudes towards their condition (Table: score 6–7): 216 (42%) reported having learned to live with their IBS but 189 (37%) were constantly worried about when their symptoms would return, and 58 (11%) agreed with the statement “When my IBS is bad, I wish I was dead”. A substantial proportion (170; 33%) wanted doctors to listen and support more and 165 (32%) agreed that healthcare professionals do not take IBS seriously. The majority of patients (296; 58%) wanted treatment to significantly improve their quality of life and 237 (46%) were willing to try anything to help manage their IBS. Conclusion We report the substantial impact of IBS-D on quality of life, medication use and the desire for more services in this patient population. There is a distinct opportunity for improved pharmacological and supportive management of IBS-D patients. Disclosure of Interest H. Törnblom Conflict with: Almirall, Allergan and Shire, Conflict with: Shire, Almirall, Probi, Tillotts, A Emmanuel Conflict with: Allergan, Kyowa Kirin, Shionogi, Shire, Takeda, R Goosey Conflict with: Kantar Health, paid consultants to Allergan plc, G Wiseman Conflict with: Allergan plc, S Baker Conflict with: Allergan plc

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38503.623646.8f

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Devereaux, P. J., Beattie, W. S., Choi, P. T.-L., Badner, N. H., Guyatt, G. H., Villar, J. C., Cinà, C. S., Leslie, K., Jacka, M. J., Montori, V. M., Bhandari, M., Avezum, A., Cavalcanti, A. B., Giles, J. W., Schricker, T., Yang, H., Jakobsen, C.-J., & Yusuf, S.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-07-04
Volume
331
Issue
7512
Pages
313-321
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2135740385
Cited by
438
References
2
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.bmj.org/licenses/tdm/1.0/terms-and-conditions.html (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.