The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skin biopsy rates and incidence of melanoma: population based ecological study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in skin biopsy rates and to determine their relation with changes in the incidence of melanoma. DESIGN: Population based ecological study. SETTING: Nine geographical areas of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme aged 65 and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the period 1986 to 2001, annual skin biopsy rates for each surveillance area from Medicare claims and incidence rates for melanoma for the same population. RESULTS: Between 1986 and 2001 the average biopsy rate across the nine participating areas increased 2.5-fold among people aged 65 and older (2847 to 7222 per 100,000 population). Over the same period the average incidence of melanoma increased 2.4-fold (45 to 108 per 100,000 population). Assuming that the occurrence of true disease was constant, the extra number of melanoma cases that were diagnosed after carrying out 1000 additional biopsies was 12.6 (95% confidence interval 11.2 to 14.0). After controlling for a potential increase in the true occurrence of disease, 1000 additional biopsies were still associated with 6.9 (3.1 to 10.8) extra melanoma cases diagnosed. Stage specific analyses suggested that 1000 biopsies were associated with 4.4 (2.1 to 6.8) extra cases of in situ melanoma diagnosed and 2.3 (0.0 to 4.6) extra cases of local melanoma, but not with the incidence of advanced melanoma. Mortality from melanoma changed little during the period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of melanoma is associated with biopsy rates. That the extra cases diagnosed were confined to early stage cancer while mortality remained stable suggests overdiagnosis-the increased incidence being largely the result of increased diagnostic scrutiny and not an increase in the incidence of disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Increasing Burden of Melanoma in the United States
Linos, E., Swetter, S. M., Cockburn, M. G., Colditz, G. A., & Clarke, C. A. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2008.423 · Cited by 746
Markovic, S. N., Erickson, L. A., Rao, R. D., McWilliams, R. R., Kottschade, L. A., Creagan, E. T., Weenig, R. H., Hand, J. L., Pittelkow, M. R., Pockaj, B. A., et al. (2007) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(11)61033-1 · Cited by 503
Recent trends in cutaneous melanoma incidence and death rates in the United States, 1992-2006
Jemal, A., Saraiya, M., Patel, P., Cherala, S. S., Barnholtz-Sloan, J., Kim, J., Wiggins, C. L., & Wingo, P. A. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.032 · Cited by 385
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Curry, S. J., Davidson, K. W., Ebell, M., Epling, J. W., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M. W., Kemper, A. R., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8465 · Cited by 322
An Epidemiologic Analysis of Melanoma Overdiagnosis in the United States, 1975–2017
Kurtansky, N. R., Dusza, S. W., Halpern, A. C., Hartman, R. I., Geller, A. C., Marghoob, A. A., Rotemberg, V. M., & Marchetti, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2021.12.003 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, H. G., Woloshin, S., & Schwartz, L. M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-08-04
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 7515
- Pages
- 481
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2139351427
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin biopsy rates and incidence of melanoma: population based ecological study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.38516.649537.e0
- The paper
- Welch, H. G., Woloshin, S., & Schwartz, L. M. (2005). Skin biopsy rates and incidence of melanoma: population based ecological study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38516.649537.e0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.