Cited by 175Bacterial Infections and VaccinesMicrobial infections and disease researchBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Risk and protective factors for meningococcal disease in adolescents: matched cohort study

Open access
Tully, Joanna, Viner, Russell M, Coen, Pietro G, Stuart, James M, Zambon, Maria, Peckham, Catherine, Booth, Clare, Klein, Nigel +2 more·2006·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine biological and social risk factors for meningococcal disease in adolescents. DESIGN: Prospective, population based, matched cohort study with controls matched for age and sex in 1:1 matching. Controls were sought from the general practitioner. SETTING: Six contiguous regions of England, which represent some 65% of the country's population. PARTICIPANTS: 15-19 year olds with meningococcal disease recruited at hospital admission in six regions (representing 65% of the population of England) from January 1999 to June 2000, and their matched controls. METHODS: Blood samples and pernasal and throat swabs were taken from case patients at admission to hospital and from cases and matched controls at interview. Data on potential risk factors were gathered by confidential interview. Data were analysed by using univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: 144 case control pairs were recruited (74 male (51%); median age 17.6). 114 cases (79%) were confirmed microbiologically. Significant independent risk factors for meningococcal disease were history of preceding illness (matched odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 5.9), intimate kissing with multiple partners (3.7, 1.7 to 8.1), being a university student (3.4, 1.2 to 10) and preterm birth (3.7, 1.0 to 13.5). Religious observance (0.09, 0.02 to 0.6) and meningococcal vaccination (0.12, 0.04 to 0.4) were associated with protection. CONCLUSIONS: Activities and events increasing risk for meningococcal disease in adolescence are different from in childhood. Students are at higher risk. Altering personal behaviours could moderate the risk. However, the development of further effective meningococcal vaccines remains a key public health priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38725.728472.be

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 14 highest-quality immune function studies, 10 (71%) reported significant positive associations or increased immune functions in response to an R/S intervention.

    “Of the 14 studies with the highest quality ratings, 10 (71%) reported significant positive associations [437–443] or increased immune functions in response to a R/S intervention [444–447].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [443]

    Table 4 reports a significant association between religious-ceremony attendance and lower risk of meningococcal disease, supporting this paper as one example of a favorable association. The paper does not report that attendance increased immune function, nor does it assess the cited tally of 10 of 14 highest-quality studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hotchin NA, Crawford DH. The diagnosis of Epstein Barr virus associated disease. In: Morgan-Capner P, ed. Current topics in clinical virology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1991:115-40.
  2. Jack D, Bidwell J, Turner M, Wood N. Simultaneous genotyping for all three known structural mutations in the human mannose-binding lectin gene. Hum Mutat 1997;9:41-6.
  3. Watson JM, Nicholas S, James P. Meningococcal infection and influenza: do surveillance data support an association? Options for the control of influenza III. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1996:82-4.
  4. Bose A, Coen P, Tully J, Viner R, Booy R. Effectiveness of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine in teenagers in England. Lancet 2003;361:675-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tully, J., Viner, R. M., Coen, P. G., Stuart, J. M., Zambon, M., Peckham, C., Booth, C., Klein, N., Kaczmarski, E., & Booy, R.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Booy, Robert
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-02-10
Volume
332
Issue
7539
Pages
445-450
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1999301355
Cited by
175
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
meningococcal disease, adolescents, risk factors, protective factors, multiple sexual partners, university students, preterm birth, meningococcal vaccination, religious practice, Neisseria meningitidis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Crowding, England, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Leisure Activities, Life Style, Meningococcal Infections, Religion, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Meningococcal Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review