The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after the end of the Malmö mammographic screening trial. DESIGN: Follow-up study. SETTING: Malmö, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 42 283 women aged 45-69 years at randomisation. INTERVENTIONS: Screening for breast cancer with mammography or not (controls). Screening was offered at the end of the randomisation design to both groups aged 45-54 at randomisation but not to groups aged 55-69 at randomisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer (in situ and invasive), calculated as incidence in the invited and control groups, during period of randomised design (period 1), during period after randomised design ended (period 2), and at end of follow-up. RESULTS: In women aged 55-69 years at randomisation the relative rates of over-diagnosis of breast cancer (95% confidence intervals) were 1.32 (1.14 to 1.53) for period 1, 0.92 (0.79 to 1.06) for period 2, and 1.10 (0.99 to 1.22) at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Conclusions on over-diagnosis of breast cancer in the Malmö mammographic screening trial can be drawn mainly for women aged 55-69 years at randomisation whose control groups were never screened. Fifteen years after the trial ended the rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer was 10% in this age group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence
Bleyer, A., & Welch, H. G. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1206809 · Cited by 1,367
Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Nelson, H. D., Tyne, K., Naik, A., Bougatsos, C., Chan, B. K., & Humphrey, L. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009 · Cited by 1,248
Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group
Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Bouvard, V., Bianchini, F., & Straif, K. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1504363 · Cited by 962
Fenton, J. J., Weyrich, M. S., Durbin, S., Liu, Y., Bang, H., & Melnikow, J. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.3712 · Cited by 555
Moss, S. M., Cuckle, H., Evans, A., Johns, L., Waller, M., & Bobrow, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69834-6 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Zackrisson, S., Andersson, I., Janzon, L., Manjer, J., & Garne, J. P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-03-03
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 7543
- Pages
- 689-692
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2082036875
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.38764.572569.7c
- The paper
- Zackrisson, S., Andersson, I., Janzon, L., Manjer, J., & Garne, J. P. (2006). Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38764.572569.7c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.