Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 962

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group

Open access
Lauby-Secretan, Béatrice, Scoccianti, Chiara, Loomis, Dana, Benbrahim-Tallaa, Lamia, Bouvard, Véronique, Bianchini, Franca, Straif, Kurt·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has updated its 2002 guidelines on screening for breast cancer, drawing on data from studies completed in the past 15 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsr1504363

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 962

Metadata

Authors
Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Bouvard, V., Bianchini, F., & Straif, K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-06-11
Volume
372
Issue
24
Pages
2353-2358
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2290344319
Cited by
962
References
25
FWCI
33.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsr1504363
The paper
Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Bouvard, V., Bianchini, F., & Straif, K. (2015). Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1504363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.