The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether infertile couples (with a time to pregnancy of > 12 months), who conceive naturally or after treatment, give birth to children with an increased prevalence of congenital malformations. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Danish national birth cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Three groups of liveborn children and their mothers: 50,897 singletons and 1366 twins born of fertile couples (time to pregnancy < or = 12 months), 5764 singletons and 100 twins born of infertile couples who conceived naturally (time to pregnancy > 12 months), and 4588 singletons and 1690 twins born after infertility treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of congenital malformations determined from hospital discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: Compared with singletons born of fertile couples, singletons born of infertile couples who conceived naturally or after treatment had a higher prevalence of congenital malformations-hazard ratios 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.35) and 1.39 (1.23 to 1.57). The overall prevalence of congenital malformations increased with increasing time to pregnancy. When the analysis was restricted to singletons born of infertile couples, babies born after treatment had an increased prevalence of genital organ malformations (hazard ratio 2.32, 1.24 to 4.35) compared with babies conceived naturally. No significant differences existed in the overall prevalence of congenital malformations among twins. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal treatment for infertility may be related to the occurrence of malformations of genital organs, but our results suggest that the reported increased prevalence of congenital malformations seen in singletons born after assisted reproductive technology is partly due to the underlying infertility or its determinants. The association between untreated infertility and congenital malformations warrants further examination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Nygren, K. G., Hazekamp, J., & Bergh, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms044 · Cited by 698
Qin, J., Liu, X., Sheng, X., Wang, H., & Gao, S. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007 · Cited by 518
The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’
Berntsen, S., Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U.-B., Laivuori, H., Loft, A., Oldereid, N. B., Romundstad, L. B., Bergh, C., & Pinborg, A. (2019) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz001 · Cited by 451
Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Bower, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt006 · Cited by 384
Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age
Luke, B., & Brown, M. B. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del522 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, J. L., Basso, O., Obel, C., Bille, C., & Olsen, J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-08-07
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 7570
- Pages
- 679
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2107315915
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.38919.495718.ae
- The paper
- Zhu, J. L., Basso, O., Obel, C., Bille, C., & Olsen, J. (2006). Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38919.495718.ae
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.