Cited by 329Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPalliative and Oncologic Care

Hope and advance care planning in patients with end stage renal disease: qualitative interview study

Open access
Davison, Sara N, Simpson, Christy·2006·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand hope in the context of advance care planning from the perspective of patients with end stage renal disease. DESIGN: Qualitative in-depth interview study. SETTING: Outpatient department of a university affiliated nephrology programme. PARTICIPANTS: 19 patients with end stage renal disease purposively selected from the renal insufficiency, haemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis clinics. RESULTS: Patients' hopes were highly individualised and were shaped by personal values. They reflected a preoccupation with their daily lives. Participants identified hope as central to the process of advance care planning in that hope helped them to determine future goals of care and provided insight into the perceived benefits of advance care planning and their willingness to engage in end of life discussions. More information earlier in the course of the illness focusing on the impact on daily life, along with empowerment of the patient and enhancing professional and personal relationships, were key factors in sustaining patients' ability to hope. This helped them to imagine possibilities for a future that were consistent with their values and hopes. The reliance on health professionals to initiate end of life discussions and the daily focus of clinical care were seen as potential barriers to hope. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitated advance care planning through the provision of timely appropriate information can positively enhance rather than diminish patients' hope. Current practices concerning disclosure of prognosis are ethically and psychologically inadequate in that they do not meet the needs of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38965.626250.55

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Davison S. Quality end-of-life care in hemodialysis units. Semin Dial 2002;15:1-4.
  2. Sardell AN, Trierweiler SJ. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis: procedures that influence patient hopefulness. Cancer 1993;72:3355-65.
  3. Forbes M. Hope in older adults with chronic illness. Appl Nurs Res 1999;22:74-87.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davison, S. N., & Simpson, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Davison, Sara N
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-09-21
Volume
333
Issue
7574
Pages
886
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2096265595
Cited by
329
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 34
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
hope, advance care planning, end-stage renal disease, end-of-life discussions, goals of care, patient values, patient empowerment, prognosis disclosure, dialysis patients, patient-professional relationship, barriers to advance care planning
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Patient Relations, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review