The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent to which components of composite end points in randomised controlled trials vary in importance to patients, the frequency of events in the more and less important components, and the extent of variability in the relative risk reductions across components. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Cardiovascular randomised controlled trials published in the Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, Circulation, European Heart Journal, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine, from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2003. Component end points of composite end points were categorised according to importance to patients as fatal, critical, major, moderate, or minor. RESULTS: Of 114 identified randomised controlled trials that included a composite end point of importance to patients, 68% (n=77) reported complete component data for the primary composite end point; almost all (98%; n=112) primary composite end points included a fatal end point. Of 84 composite end points for which component data were available, 54% (n=45) showed large or moderate gradients in both importance to patients and magnitude of effect across components. When analysed by categories of importance to patients, the most important components were associated with lower event rates in the control group (medians of 3.3-3.7% for fatal, critical, and major outcomes; 12.3% for moderate outcomes; and 8.0% for minor outcomes). Components of greater importance to patients were associated with smaller treatment effects than less important ones (relative risk reduction of 8% for death and 33% for components of minor importance to patients). CONCLUSION: The use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials is frequently complicated by large gradients in importance to patients and in magnitude of the effect of treatment across component end points. Higher event rates and larger treatment effects associated with less important components may result in misleading impressions of the impact of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Lewis, E. J., Hunsicker, L. G., Clarke, W. R., Berl, T., Pohl, M. A., Lewis, J. B., Ritz, E., Atkins, R. C., Rohde, R., & Raz, I. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011303 · Cited by 5,987
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
Composite Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Greater Precision But With Greater Uncertainty?
Freemantle, N., Calvert, M., Wood, J., Eastaugh, J., & Griffin, C. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2554 · Cited by 783
One Thousand Health-Related Quality-of-Life Estimates
Tengs, T. O., & Wallace, A. (2000) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004 · Cited by 662
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials
Montori, V. M., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Ferreira-González, I., Busse, J. W., Pacheco-Huergo, V., Bryant, D., Alonso, J., Akl, E. A., Domingo-Salvany, A., Mills, E., et al. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7491.594 · Cited by 442
Self-citationPatients at the centre: in our practice, and in our use of language
Guyatt, G. H. (2004) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/ebm.9.1.6 · Cited by 151
Self-citationIntravascular Gamma Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous-Vein Bypass Grafts
Waksman, R., Ajani, A. E., White, R. L., Chan, R. C., Satler, L. F., Kent, K. M., Pichard, A. D., Pinnow, E. E., Bui, A. B., Ramee, S. R., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012579 · Cited by 145
Key Issues in End Point Selection for Heart Failure Trials: Composite End Points
Neaton, J. D., Gray, G. W., Zuckerman, B. D., & Konstam, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.08.350 · Cited by 132
Lessons Learned From Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: Part II
DeMets, D. L., & Califf, R. M. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000023220.26465.89 · Cited by 122
Cited by
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gotzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., Dickersin, K., Hrobjartsson, A., Schulz, K. F., Parulekar, W. R., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586 · Cited by 6,251
Moons, K. G. M., de Groot, J. A. H., Bouwmeester, W., Vergouwe, Y., Mallett, S., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., & Collins, G. S. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 · Cited by 2,018
“combined outcomes is particularly challenging [82,83].”
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Greenland, S., Hlatky, M. A., Khoury, M. J., Macleod, M. R., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62227-8 · Cited by 1,597
Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira-González, I., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Domingo-Salvany, A., Busse, J. W., Heels-Ansdell, D., Montori, V. M., Akl, E. A., Bryant, D. M., Alonso-Coello, P., Alonso, J., Worster, A., Upadhye, S., Jaeschke, R., Schünemann, H. J., Pacheco-Huergo, V., Wu, P., Mills, E. J., & Guyatt, G. H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2007-04-02
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 7597
- Pages
- 786
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2042805913
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39136.682083.ae
- The paper
- Ferreira-González, I., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Domingo-Salvany, A., Busse, J. W., Heels-Ansdell, D., Montori, V. M., Akl, E. A., Bryant, D. M., Alonso-Coello, P., Alonso, J., Worster, A., Upadhye, S., Jaeschke, R., Schünemann, H. J., Pacheco-Huergo, V., Wu, P., Mills, E. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2007). Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39136.682083.ae
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
