The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delirium in older people
Open accessAbstract
Few ill health situations are more degrading to people of any age than loss of reasoning, faculties, and personhood. These are the unpleasant consequences of delirium—a common condition affecting ill older people, particularly those with some degree of dementia. It is characterised by recent onset of fluctuating inattention and confusion, linked to one or more triggering factors. #### SUMMARY POINTS Delirium is a major burden to healthcare services and has been largely ignored by health service planners and practitioners.1 Moreover, healthcare systems and services often unintentionally stimulate or substantially aggravate the development of delirium in older people.2 This might be understandable if delirium was unavoidable or untreatable, but the existing evidence base for delirium is sufficiently robust for prevention or attenuation of the condition to be a realistic proposition. There is a pressing need to take this action because the outcomes for delirium are poor: it contributes to substantial morbidity and mortality, causes considerable distress to patients and families, and is expensive—an estimated additional $2500 (£1275; €1875) per patient (a $6.9bn annual expenditure for Medicare in 2004).3 We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library from 1996 to 2006. We drew additional material from our personal libraries of delirium references, focusing particularly on systematic reviews. Delirium is an important problem for all clinical services providing care for older people, particularly emergency departments; general medical, elderly care, surgical, and …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reuben, D. B., Inouye, S. K., Bogardus, S. T., Baker, D. I., Leo‐Summers, L., & Cooney, L. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03885.x · Cited by 802
Self-citation
Cited by
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients
Siddiqi, N., Harrison, J. K., Clegg, A., Teale, E. A., Young, J., Taylor, J., & Simpkins, S. A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005563.pub3 · Cited by 619
Self-citationUnravelling the pathophysiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses
MacLullich, A. M. J., Ferguson, K. J., Miller, T., de Rooij, S. E. J. A., & Cunningham, C. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.019 · Cited by 447
Ansaloni, L., Catena, F., Chattat, R., Fortuna, D., Franceschi, C., Mascitti, P., & Melotti, R. M. (2010) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6843 · Cited by 359
Zywiel, M. G., Hurley, R. T., Perruccio, A. V., Hancock-Howard, R. L., Coyte, P. C., & Rampersaud, Y. R. (2015) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.n.00724 · Cited by 141
Carpenter, W. T., Bustillo, J. R., Thaker, G. K., van Os, J., Krueger, R. F., & Green, M. J. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709990286 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, J., & Inouye, S. K.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2007-04-19
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 7598
- Pages
- 842-846
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1996617304
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delirium in older people. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39169.706574.ad
- The paper
- Young, J., & Inouye, S. K. (2007). Delirium in older people. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39169.706574.ad
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.