Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unravelling the pathophysiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses

Open access
MacLullich, Alasdair M.J., Ferguson, Karen J., Miller, Thomas, de Rooij, Sophia E.J.A., Cunningham, Colm·2008·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Delirium is a common and serious acute neuropsychiatric syndrome with core features of inattention and cognitive impairment, and associated features including changes in arousal, altered sleep-wake cycle, and other changes in mental status. The main risk factors are old age, cognitive impairment, and other comorbidities. Though delirium has consistent core clinical features, it has a very wide range of precipitating factors, including acute illness, surgery, trauma, and drugs. The molecular mechanisms by which these precipitating factors lead to delirium are largely obscure. In this article we attempt to narrow down some specific causal pathways. We propose a basic classification for the aetiological factors: (a) direct brain insults, and (b) aberrant stress responses. Direct brain insults are largely indiscriminate and include general and regional energy deprivation (eg. hypoxia, hypoglycaemia, stroke), metabolic abnormalities (eg. hyponatraemia, hypercalcaemia), and the effects of drugs. Aberrant stress responses are conceptually and mechanistically distinct in that they constitute adverse effects of stress-response pathways which, in health, are adaptive. Ageing and central nervous system disease, two major predisposing factors for delirium, are associated with alterations in the magnitude or duration of stress and sickness behaviour responses, and increased vulnerability to the effects of these responses. We discuss in detail two stress response systems that are likely to be involved in the pathophysiology of delirium: inflammation and the sickness behaviour response, and activity of the limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. We conclude by discussing the implications for future research and the development of new therapies for delirium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.019

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
MacLullich, A. M. J., Ferguson, K. J., Miller, T., de Rooij, S. E. J. A., & Cunningham, C.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
229-238
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973706152
Cited by
447
References
100
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unravelling the pathophysiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.019
The paper
MacLullich, A. M. J., Ferguson, K. J., Miller, T., de Rooij, S. E. J. A., & Cunningham, C. (2008). Unravelling the pathophysiology of delirium: A focus on the role of aberrant stress responses. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.