Cited by 98Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPharmaceutical industry and healthcareAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical trial registration

Open access

Abstract

Looking back and moving ahead

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39233.510810.80

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Registration of clinical trials should occur before recruitment of the first trial participant, as mandated by ICMJE and jurisdictional legislation.

    “As mandated by the ICMJE and jurisdictional legislation,31 32 66 registration of clinical trials should occur before recruitment of the first trial participant.”
  • The WHO Trial Registration Data Set standards are supported by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, other journal editors, and legislation in many countries.

    “These standards are supported by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), other journal editors, and legislation in many countries.31 32 33”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chen Y-J, Kang W-M, So WCM. Comparison of antiepileptic drugs Comparison of antiepileptic drugs on cognitive function in newly diagnosed epileptic children: a psychometric and neurophysiological study. Epilepsia 1996;37:81-6.
  2. Pal DK, Das T, Chaudhury G, Johnson AL, Neville BG. Randomised Randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy in rural India. Lancet 1998;351:19-23.
  3. Mac TL, Le VT, Vu AN, Preux PM, Ratsimbazafy V. Antiepileptic drugs availability and professional practices in delivery outlets in a city center in southern Vietnam. Epilepsia 2006;47:330-4.
  4. Maxwell JC. Methamphetamine: a constantly changing epidemic. EpiLink Online Bull 2007;64:22-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laine, C., Horton, R., DeAngelis, C. D., Drazen, J. M., Frizelle, F. A., Godlee, F., Haug, C., Hébert, P. C., Kotzin, S., Marusic, A., Sahni, P., Schroeder, T. V., Sox, H. C., Weyden, M. B. V. D., & Verheugt, F. W. A.
Corresponding author
Laine, Christine
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-06-04
Volume
334
Issue
7605
Pages
1177-1178
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2062655436
Cited by
98
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
clinical trial registration, clinical trials, research transparency
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Publishing, Registries, Organizational Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review