Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antenatal education and postnatal support strategies for improving rates of exclusive breast feeding: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Su, Lin-Lin, Chong, Yap-Seng, Chan, Yiong-Huak, Chan, Yah-Shih, Fok, Doris, Tun, Kay-Thwe, Ng, Faith S P, Rauff, Mary·2007·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether antenatal breast feeding education alone or postnatal lactation support alone improves rates of exclusive breast feeding compared with routine hospital care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: 450 women with uncomplicated pregnancies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were rates of exclusive breast feeding at discharge from hospital and two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months after delivery. Secondary outcomes were rates of any breast feeding. RESULTS: Compared with women who received routine care, women in the postnatal support group were more likely to breastfeed exclusively at two weeks (relative risk 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.90), six weeks (1.85, 1.11 to 3.09), three months (1.87, 1.03 to 3.41), and six months (2.12, 1.03 to 4.37) postnatally. Women receiving antenatal education were more likely to breast feed exclusively at six weeks (1.73, 1.04 to 2.90), three months (1.92, 1.07 to 3.48), and six months (2.16, 1.05 to 4.43) postnatally. The numbers needed to treat to achieve one woman exclusively breast feeding at six months were 11 (6 to 80) for postnatal support and 10 (6 to 60) for antenatal education. Women who received postnatal support were more likely to exclusively or predominantly breast feed two weeks after delivery compared with women who received antenatal education (1.53, 1.01 to 2.31). The rate of any breastfeeding six weeks after delivery was also higher in the postnatal support group compared with women who received routine care (1.16, 1.02 to 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal breast feeding education and postnatal lactation support, as single interventions based in hospital both significantly improve rates of exclusive breast feeding up to six months after delivery. Postnatal support was marginally more effective than antenatal education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00270920 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39279.656343.55

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Su, L.-L., Chong, Y.-S., Chan, Y.-H., Chan, Y.-S., Fok, D., Tun, K.-T., Ng, F. S. P., & Rauff, M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
335
Issue
7620
Pages
596
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2142880078
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antenatal education and postnatal support strategies for improving rates of exclusive breast feeding: randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39279.656343.55
The paper
Su, L.-L., Chong, Y.-S., Chan, Y.-H., Chan, Y.-S., Fok, D., Tun, K.-T., Ng, F. S. P., & Rauff, M. (2007). Antenatal education and postnatal support strategies for improving rates of exclusive breast feeding: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39279.656343.55

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.