Cited by 53Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchECG Monitoring and Analysis

Incremental prognostic value of the exercise electrocardiogram in the initial assessment of patients with suspected angina: cohort study

Open access
Sekhri, N., Feder, G. S, Junghans, C., Eldridge, S., Umaipalan, A., Madhu, R., Hemingway, H., Timmis, A. D·2008·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether resting and exercise electrocardiograms (ECGs) provide prognostic value that is incremental to that obtained from the clinical history in ambulatory patients with suspected angina attending chest pain clinics. DESIGN: Multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Rapid access chest pain clinics of six hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: 8176 consecutive patients with suspected angina and no previous diagnosis of coronary artery disease, all of whom had a resting ECG recorded. 4848 patients with a summary exercise ECG result recorded (positive, negative, equivocal for ischaemia) comprised the summary ECG subset of whom 1422 with more detailed exercise ECG data recorded comprised the detailed ECG subset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite of death due to coronary heart disease or non-fatal acute coronary syndrome during median follow-up of 2.46 years. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristics curves for the basic clinical assessment model alone and with the results of resting ECGs were superimposed with little difference in the C statistic. With the exercise ECGs the C statistic in the summary ECG subset increased from 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.73) to 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76) and in the detailed ECG subset from 0.74 (0.70 to 0.79) to 0.78 (0.74 to 0.82). However, risk stratified cumulative probabilities of the primary end point at one year and six years for all three prognostic indices (clinical assessment only; clinical assessment plus resting ECG; clinical assessment plus resting ECG plus exercise ECG) showed only small differences at all time points and at all levels of risk. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory patients with suspected angina, basic clinical assessment encompasses nearly all the prognostic value of resting ECGs and most of the prognostic value of exercise ECGs. The limited incremental value of these widely applied tests emphasises the need for more effective methods of risk stratification in this group of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.a2240

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • British investigators found a limited incremental value of the resting ECG in ambulatory patients with suspected angina, increased somewhat by adding exercise ECG data.

    “Although British investigators found a limited incremental value of the resting ECG in ambulatory patients with suspected angina, increased somewhat by adding exercise ECG data, 40 several other recent investigators demonstrated prognostic value of various ECG parameters.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marwick TH, Mehta R, Arheart K, Lauer MS. Use of exercise echocardiography for prognostic evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:83-90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekhri, N., Feder, G. S., Junghans, C., Eldridge, S., Umaipalan, A., Madhu, R., Hemingway, H., & Timmis, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Newham University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Timmis, A. D
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-11-13
Volume
337
Issue
nov13 2
Pages
a2240-a2240
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2026794181
Cited by
53
References
48
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (05/40/04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
exercise electrocardiography, resting electrocardiogram, acute coronary syndrome, risk stratification, chest pain clinic, incremental prognostic value, medical history, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
Angina Pectoris, Coronary Artery Disease, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review