The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secular trends in self reported sexual activity and satisfaction in Swedish 70 year olds: cross sectional survey of four populations, 1971-2001
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study secular trends in self reported sexual behaviour among 70 year olds. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. Settings Four samples representative of the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 1506 adults (946 women, 560 men) examined in 1971-2, 1976-7, 1992-3, and 2000-1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual intercourse, attitudes to sexuality in later life, sexual dysfunctions, and marital satisfaction. RESULTS: From 1971 to 2000 the proportion of 70 year olds reporting sexual intercourse increased among all groups: married men from 52% to 68% (P=0.002), married women from 38% to 56% (P=0.001), unmarried men from 30% to 54% (P=0.016), and unmarried women from 0.8% to 12% (P<0.001). Men and women from later birth cohorts reported higher satisfaction with sexuality, fewer sexual dysfunctions, and more positive attitudes to sexuality in later life than those from earlier birth cohorts. A larger proportion of men (57% v 40%, P<0.001) and women (52% v 35%, P<0.001) reported very happy relationships in 2000-1 compared with those in 1971-2. Sexual debut before age 20 increased in both sexes: in men from 52% to 77% (P<0.001) and in women from 19% to 64% (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Self reported quantity and quality of sexual experiences among Swedish 70 year olds has improved over a 30 year period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States
Lindau, S. T., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Levinson, W., O'Muircheartaigh, C. A., & Waite, L. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067423 · Cited by 2,211
Laumann, E. O., Nicolosi, A., Glasser, D. B., Paik, A., Gingell, C., Moreira, E., Wang, T., & for the GSSAB Investigators' Group (2005) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901250 · Cited by 1,415
Cited by
Lindau, S. T., & Gavrilova, N. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c810 · Cited by 528
Sleep disturbances and dementia risk: a multicenter study
Sindi, S., Kåreholt, I., Johansson, L., Skoog, J., Sjöberg, L., Wang, H., Johansson, B., Fratiglioni, L., Soininen, H., Solomon, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.012 · Cited by 144
Self-citationLinking big five personality traits to sexuality and sexual health: A meta-analytic review
Allen, M. S., & Walter, E. E. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000157 · Cited by 142
Physical activity to improve erectile function: a systematic review of intervention studies
Gerbild, H., Larsen, C. M., Graugaard, C., & Areskoug Josefsson, K. (2018) · Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2018.02.001 · Cited by 121
Sjöberg, L., Östling, S., Falk, H., Sundh, V., Waern, M., & Skoog, I. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.002 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckman, N., Waern, M., Gustafson, D., & Skoog, I.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-07-08
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- jul08 3
- Pages
- a279-a279
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1983459208
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.