The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pre-eclampsia is more common in first pregnancies solely because fewer affected women, who presumably have a higher risk of recurrence, go on to have subsequent pregnancies. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Swedish Medical Birth Register. PARTICIPANTS: 763 795 primiparous mothers who had their first births in Sweden, 1987-2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: The risk of pre-eclampsia was 4.1% in the first pregnancy and 1.7% in later pregnancies overall. However, the risk was 14.7% in the second pregnancy for women who had had pre-eclampsia in their first pregnancy and 31.9% for women who had had pre-eclampsia in the previous two pregnancies. The risk for multiparous women without a history of pre-eclampsia was around 1%. The incidence of pre-eclampsia associated with delivery before 34 weeks' gestation was 0.42% in primiparous women, 0.11% in multiparous women without a history of pre-eclampsia, and 6.8% and 12.5% in women who had had one or two previous pregnancies affected, respectively. The proportion of women who went on to have a further pregnancy was 4-5% lower after having a pregnancy with any pre-eclampsia but over 10% lower if pre-eclampsia was associated with very preterm delivery. The estimated risk of pre-eclampsia in parous women did not change with standardisation for pregnancy rates. CONCLUSIONS: Having pre-eclampsia in one pregnancy is a poor predictor of subsequent pregnancy but a strong predictor for recurrence of pre-eclampsia in future gestations. The lower overall risk of pre-eclampsia among parous women was not explained by fewer conceptions among women who had had pre-eclampsia in a previous gestation. Early onset pre-eclampsia might be associated with a reduced likelihood of a future pregnancy and with more recurrences than late onset pre-eclampsia when there are further pregnancies. Findings are consistent with the existence of two distinct conditions: a severe recurrent early onset type affected by chronic factors, genetic or environmental, and a milder sporadic form affected by transient factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
Underlying disorders associated with severe early-onset preeclampsia
Dekker, G. A., de Vries, J. I. P., Doelitzsch, P. M., Huijgens, P. C., von Blomberg, B. M. E., Jakobs, C., & van Geijn, H. P. (1995) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)91324-6 · Cited by 511
Ros, H. S., Cnattingius, S., & Lipworth, L. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009400 · Cited by 401
Self-citationSevere preeclampsia in the second trimester: Recurrence risk and long-term prognosis
Sibai, B. M., Mercer, B., & Sarinoglu, C. (1991) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90379-6 · Cited by 317
Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre‐eclampsia
Ødegård, R. A., Vatten, L. J., Nilsen, S. T., Salvesen, K. Å., & Austgulen, R. (2000) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11657.x · Cited by 237
The effects and mechanisms of primiparity on the risk of pre‐eclampsia: a systematic review
Luo, Z., An, N., Xu, H., Larante, A., Audibert, F., & Fraser, W. D. (2007) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00836.x · Cited by 167
Myatt, L., & Miodovnik, M. (1999) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1016/s0146-0005(99)80059-7 · Cited by 156
Abortion, Changed Paternity, and Risk of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women
Saftlas, A. F. (2003) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwg101 · Cited by 144
Cited by
Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications
Burton, G. J., Redman, C. W., Roberts, J. M., & Moffett, A. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l2381 · Cited by 1,250
Poon, L. C., Shennan, A., Hyett, J. A., Kapur, A., Hadar, E., Divakar, H., McAuliffe, F., da Silva Costa, F., von Dadelszen, P., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12802 · Cited by 1,238
Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Hutcheon, J. A., Lisonkova, S., & Joseph, K. S. (2011) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.006 · Cited by 1,045
Bartsch, E., Medcalf, K. E., Park, A. L., & Ray, J. G. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i1753 · Cited by 996
Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis
Ananth, C. V., Keyes, K. M., & Wapner, R. J. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f6564 · Cited by 940
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernandez-Diaz, S., Toh, S., & Cnattingius, S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-06-18
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- jun18 1
- Pages
- b2255-b2255
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085417875
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.b2255
- The paper
- Hernandez-Diaz, S., Toh, S., & Cnattingius, S. (2009). Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.