Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in European populations:a nested case-control study

Open access
Jenab, M., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B., Ferrari, P., van Duijnhoven, F. J B, Norat, T., Pischon, T., Jansen, E. H J M, Slimani, N., Byrnes, G., Rinaldi, S., Tjonneland, A., Olsen, A., Overvad, K., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Morois, S., Kaaks, R., Linseisen, J., Boeing, H., Bergmann, M. M, Trichopoulou, A., Misirli, G., Trichopoulos, D., Berrino, F., Vineis, P., Panico, S., Palli, D., Tumino, R., Ros, M. M, van Gils, C. H, Peeters, P. H, Brustad, M., Lund, E., Tormo, M.-J., Ardanaz, E., Rodriguez, L., Sanchez, M.-J., Dorronsoro, M., Gonzalez, C. A, Hallmans, G., Palmqvist, R., Roddam, A., Key, T. J, Khaw, K.-T., Autier, P., Hainaut, P., Riboli, E.·2010·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration, dietary intake of vitamin D and calcium, and the risk of colorectal cancer in European populations. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. Setting The study was conducted within the EPIC study, a cohort of more than 520 000 participants from 10 western European countries. PARTICIPANTS: 1248 cases of incident colorectal cancer, which developed after enrolment into the cohort, were matched to 1248 controls MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Circulating vitamin D concentration (25-hydroxy-vitamin-D, 25-(OH)D) was measured by enzyme immunoassay. Dietary and lifestyle data were obtained from questionnaires. Incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of colorectal cancer by 25-(OH)D concentration and levels of dietary calcium and vitamin D intake were estimated from multivariate conditional logistic regression models, with adjustment for potential dietary and other confounders. RESULTS: 25-(OH)D concentration showed a strong inverse linear dose-response association with risk of colorectal cancer (P for trend <0.001). Compared with a pre-defined mid-level concentration of 25-(OH)D (50.0-75.0 nmol/l), lower levels were associated with higher colorectal cancer risk (<25.0 nmol/l: incidence rate ratio 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 2.01); 25.0-49.9 nmol/l: 1.28 (1.05 to 1.56), and higher concentrations associated with lower risk (75.0-99.9 nmol/l: 0.88 (0.68 to 1.13); >or=100.0 nmol/l: 0.77 (0.56 to 1.06)). In analyses by quintile of 25-(OH)D concentration, patients in the highest quintile had a 40% lower risk of colorectal cancer than did those in the lowest quintile (P<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed a strong association for colon but not rectal cancer (P for heterogeneity=0.048). Greater dietary intake of calcium was associated with a lower colorectal cancer risk. Dietary vitamin D was not associated with disease risk. Findings did not vary by sex and were not altered by corrections for season or month of blood donation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large observational study indicate a strong inverse association between levels of pre-diagnostic 25-(OH)D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in western European populations. Further randomised trials are needed to assess whether increases in circulating 25-(OH)D concentration can effectively decrease the risk of colorectal cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.b5500

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 404

Metadata

Authors
Jenab, M., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., Ferrari, P., van Duijnhoven, F. J. B., Norat, T., Pischon, T., Jansen, E. H. J. M., Slimani, N., Byrnes, G., Rinaldi, S., Tjonneland, A., Olsen, A., Overvad, K., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Morois, S., Kaaks, R., Linseisen, J., Boeing, H., Bergmann, M. M., Trichopoulou, A., Misirli, G., Trichopoulos, D., Berrino, F., Vineis, P., Panico, S., Palli, D., Tumino, R., Ros, M. M., van Gils, C. H., Peeters, P. H., Brustad, M., Lund, E., Tormo, M.-J., Ardanaz, E., Rodriguez, L., Sanchez, M.-J., Dorronsoro, M., Gonzalez, C. A., Hallmans, G., Palmqvist, R., Roddam, A., Key, T. J., Khaw, K.-T., Autier, P., Hainaut, P., & Riboli, E.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-01-21
Volume
340
Issue
jan21 3
Pages
b5500-b5500
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2107963470
Cited by
404
References
4
FWCI
32.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in European populations:a nested case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.b5500
The paper
Jenab, M., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., Ferrari, P., van Duijnhoven, F. J. B., Norat, T., Pischon, T., Jansen, E. H. J. M., Slimani, N., Byrnes, G., Rinaldi, S., Tjonneland, A., Olsen, A., Overvad, K., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Morois, S., Kaaks, R., Linseisen, J., Boeing, H., . . . Riboli, E. (2010). Association between pre-diagnostic circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of colorectal cancer in European populations:a nested case-control study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5500

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.