The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of staples versus sutures in wound closure after orthopaedic surgery. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched, in addition to the grey literature, in all languages from 1950 to September 2009. Additional studies were identified from cited references. Selection criteria Two authors independently assessed papers for eligibility. Included studies were randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that compared the use of staples with suture material for wound closure after orthopaedic surgery procedures. All studies were included, and publications were not excluded because of poor methodological quality. Review methods Two authors independently reviewed studies for methodological quality and extracted data from each paper. Final data for analysis were collated through consensus. The primary outcome measure was the assessment of superficial wound infection after wound closure with staples compared with sutures. Relative risk and mean difference with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled with a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I(2) and chi(2) statistical test. RESULTS: Six papers, which included 683 wounds, were identified; 332 patients underwent suture closure and 351 staple closure. The risk of developing a superficial wound infection after orthopaedic procedures was over three times greater after staple closure than suture closure (relative risk 3.83, 95% confidence interval 1.38 to 10.68; P=0.01). On subgroup analysis of hip surgery alone, the risk of developing a wound infection was four times greater after staple closure than suture closure (4.79, 1.24 to 18.47; P=0.02). There was no significant difference between sutures and staples in the development of inflammation, discharge, dehiscence, necrosis, and allergic reaction. The included studies had several major methodological limitations, including the recruitment of small, underpowered cohorts, poorly randomising patients, and not blinding assessors to the allocated methods of wound closure. Only one study had acceptable methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: After orthopaedic surgery, there is a significantly higher risk of developing a wound infection when the wound is closed with staples rather than sutures. This risk is specifically greater in patients who undergo hip surgery. The use of staples for closing hip or knee surgery wounds after orthopaedic procedures cannot be recommended, though the evidence comes from studies with substantial methodological limitations. Though we advise orthopaedic surgeons to reconsider their use of staples for wound closure, definitive randomised trials are still needed to assess this research question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials
Maher, C. G., Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M., & Elkins, M. (2003) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · Cited by 4,808
An Introduction to Medical Statistics.
(1931) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1931.02730150055037 · Cited by 2,084
Tissue oxygenation, anemia, and perfusion in relation to wound healing in surgical patients.
JONSSON, K., JENSEN, J. A., GOODSON, W. H., SCHEUENSTUHL, H., WEST, J., HOPF, H. W., & HUNT, T. K. (1991) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199111000-00011 · Cited by 462
Saleh, K., Olson, M., Resig, S., Bershadsky, B., Kuskowski, M., Gioe, T., Robinson, H., Schmidt, R., & McElfresh, E. (2002) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(01)00153-x · Cited by 395
Foley, N. C., Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R. W., Bureau, Y., & Speechley, M. R. (2006) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/86.6.817 · Cited by 231
Khan, R. J. K., Fick, D., Yao, F., Tang, K., Hurworth, M., Nivbrant, B., & Wood, D. (2006) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.16923 · Cited by 188
An Introduction to Medical Statistics
&NA; (1990) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199002000-00038 · Cited by 183
Cited by
A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue
Yang, S. Y., O'Cearbhaill, E. D., Sisk, G. C., Park, K. M., Cho, W. K., Villiger, M., Bouma, B. E., Pomahac, B., & Karp, J. M. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2715 · Cited by 448
Engineering a highly elastic human protein–based sealant for surgical applications
Annabi, N., Zhang, Y.-N., Assmann, A., Sani, E. S., Cheng, G., Lassaletta, A. D., Vegh, A., Dehghani, B., Ruiz-Esparza, G. U., Wang, X., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7466 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, T. O., Sexton, D., Mann, C., & Donell, S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-03-16
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- mar16 1
- Pages
- c1199-c1199
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2119236878
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.c1199
- The paper
- Smith, T. O., Sexton, D., Mann, C., & Donell, S. (2010). Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.