Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL

Open access
Khan, R. J. K., Fick, D., Yao, F., Tang, K., Hurworth, M., Nivbrant, B., Wood, D.·2006·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

Abstract

We carried out a blinded prospective randomised controlled trial comparing 2-octylcyanoacrylate (OCA), subcuticular suture (monocryl) and skin staples for skin closure following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. We included 102 hip replacements and 85 of the knee. OCA was associated with less wound discharge in the first 24 hours for both the hip and the knee. However, with total knee replacement there was a trend for a more prolonged wound discharge with OCA. With total hip replacement there was no significant difference between the groups for either early or late complications. Closure of the wound with skin staples was significantly faster than with OCA or suture. There was no significant difference in the length of stay in hospital, Hollander wound evaluation score (cosmesis) or patient satisfaction between the groups at six weeks for either hips or knees. We consider that skin staples are the skin closure of choice for both hip and knee replacements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.16923

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Khan, R. J. K., Fick, D., Yao, F., Tang, K., Hurworth, M., Nivbrant, B., & Wood, D.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Published
2006-02
Volume
88-B
Issue
2
Pages
238-242
ISSN
  • 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5377
OpenAlex
W2264274194
Cited by
188
References
2
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.16923
The paper
Khan, R. J. K., Fick, D., Yao, F., Tang, K., Hurworth, M., Nivbrant, B., & Wood, D. (2006). A comparison of three methods of wound closure following arthroplasty: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.16923

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.